Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Unified treatment algorithm for the management of crotaline snakebite in the United States: results of an evidence-informed consensus workshop

  • Eric J Lavonas1, 2Email author,
  • Anne-Michelle Ruha3,
  • William Banner4, 5,
  • Vikhyat Bebarta6,
  • Jeffrey N Bernstein7, 8,
  • Sean P Bush9,
  • William P KernsII10,
  • William H Richardson11, 12,
  • Steven A Seifert13, 14,
  • David A Tanen15, 16,
  • Steve C Curry3 and
  • Richard C Dart1, 2
Contributed equally
BMC Emergency Medicine201111:2

DOI: 10.1186/1471-227X-11-2

Received: 11 August 2010

Accepted: 3 February 2011

Published: 3 February 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Aug 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jean-Philippe Chippaux
10 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andreimar Soares
13 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Janaka de Silva
13 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Eric Lavonas
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jean-Philippe Chippaux
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
1 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Eric Lavonas
Resubmission - Version 6
1 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
3 Feb 2011 Editorially accepted
3 Feb 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-227X-11-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Rocky Mountain Poison and Drug Center, Denver Health and Hospital Authority
(2)
Division of Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine
(3)
Department of Medical Toxicology, Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center
(4)
Oklahoma Poison Center, College of Pharmacy, University of Oklahoma
(5)
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Integris Baptist Medical Center
(6)
Department of Emergency Medicine, Wilford Hall Medical Center
(7)
Florida Poison Information Center
(8)
Emergency Care Center, Jackson Memorial Hospital
(9)
Department of Emergency Medicine, Loma Linda University School of Medicine
(10)
Division of Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine and Carolinas Poison Center, Carolinas Medical Center
(11)
Department of Emergency Medicine, Palmetto Health Richland
(12)
Palmetto Poison Center, University of South Carolina
(13)
New Mexico Poison and Drug Information Center, College of Pharmacy, University of New Mexico
(14)
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine
(15)
Naval Medical Center
(16)
Division of Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California at San Diego

Advertisement