Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Over-prescribing of antibiotics and imaging in the management of uncomplicated URIs in emergency departments

BMC Emergency Medicine volume 13, Article number: 7 (2013) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Unnecessary use of resources for common illnesses has substantial effect on patient care and costs. Evidence-based guidelines do not recommend antibiotics or imaging for uncomplicated upper respiratory infections (URIs). The objective of the current study was to examine medical care providers’ compliance with guidelines in treating uncomplicated URIs in emergency departments (EDs) in the US.

Methods

Nationally representative data from the NHAMCS 2007 and 2008 were used. Uncomplicated URIs were identified through ICD-9 codes of nasopharyngitis, laryngitis, bronchitis, URI not otherwise specified and influenza involving upper respiratory tract. Exclusion criteria were concurrent comorbidities, follow-up visits, and age < 18 or >64 years. Most frequently prescribed classes of antibiotics were identified. Multivariate analyses were conducted to identify the factors associated with the prescribing of antibiotics and use of imaging studies.

Results

In 2007 and 2008, there were 2.2 million adult uncomplicated URI visits without any other concurrent diagnoses in EDs in the US. Approximately 52% were given antibiotic prescriptions, over one-third of which were macrolides, and nearly half of the visits performed imaging studies. About 51% had a diagnosis of bronchitis, 35% URI NOS, 9% nasopharyngitis, laryngitis or influenza, and 4% multiple URI diagnoses. The diagnosis of bronchitis, fever at presentation, older ages, male gender, longer waiting time, and metropolitan areas were associated with a greater likelihood of prescribing antibiotics or imaging studies, controlling for confounding factors.

Conclusion

Despite the recommendations and campaign efforts by the CDC and many medical associations, the prescribing of antibiotics in treating uncomplicated URIs in the EDs remains prevalent. Furthermore, overutilization of imaging studies is prevalent. Changes at levels of health care system and hospitals are needed to avoid unnecessary resource utilization. In addition, further patient education about antibiotic use in the community may greatly facilitate the transition out of an antibiotic-dependent consumer culture.

Peer Review reports

Background

Inappropriate testing and treatments can lead to substantial over-expenditure in managing uncomplicated illnesses. Acute upper respiratory tract infection (URI) is one of the most common diagnoses seen in emergency departments (EDs) in the US. Between 1995 and 2000, there was an average of 8.5 million annual URI visits to the EDs [1], representing about 8% of all ED visits. In 2001–2002, about 23.7% of all ambulatory care visits were related to URIs [2]. To reduce the high prevalence of inappropriate treatment of uncomplicated URIs, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other medical organizations published guidelines for appropriate management.

The most studied aspect of the guidelines was the use of antibiotics. Several studies in the ambulatory care setting [3–5] and EDs [1] found that antibiotics were inappropriately used in over 50% of cases in the late 1990s and early 2000s. The study specific to EDs estimated the prevalence of inappropriate antibiotic use to be around 57% of adult URI visits [1]. One study showed that although the overall prevalence of antibiotic use was decreasing over time, the prescription of broad-spectrum antibiotics was on the rise [2]. The same study also concluded that the prevalence rates were comparable between EDs, office practices and outpatient clinics.

Imaging, especially plain radiography, of chest, has been utilized extensively in diagnosing respiratory diseases because of its availability, convenience and low cost. Several studies have demonstrated that unless a clinician suspected pneumonia or pathologies other than an uncomplicated URIs, imaging did not have additional diagnostic values after a thorough history and physical examination [6–9]. Consequently, CDC guidelines recommended that no routine diagnostic tests or imaging were needed without other indications in the outpatient management of uncomplicated URIs.

The objective of the current study was to examine medical care providers’ compliance with CDC guidelines in treating uncomplicated URIs in EDs in the US. The results provided benchmarks of providers’ compliance and insights into more effective and efficient management of uncomplicated URIs in emergency departments.

Methods

Nationally representative emergency department data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) 2007 and 2008 were used. Key data elements included patient demographic characteristics, visit characteristics, vital signs, tests, procedures, medications, discharge status and up to 3 diagnoses in ICD-9 codes. Details of the NHAMCS can be found at the CDC website (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ahcd.htm).

Uncomplicated URI diagnoses included ICD-9 codes for nasopharyngitis, laryngitis, bronchitis, URI NOS, and influenza involving upper respiratory tract. Several considerations were taken in selecting URI visits for the analyses. First, concurrent diagnoses of infections other than URIs, for example, urinary tract infection, could make the use of antibiotics appropriate. Second, antibiotic use could be appropriate for some upper respiratory infections, for example, sinusitis and otitis media. Third, concurrent chronic and acute diseases and conditions could justify the use of more aggressive treatments and diagnostic tests. Lastly, management strategies were different among pediatric, adult, and elderly patients.

Based on these considerations and the sample selection procedures used in previous studies of URIs using the NHAMCS data, the following inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to identify adult patients presenting with only uncomplicated URIs:

Inclusion

Diagnoses of nasopharyngitis or common cold (ICD-9 460), laryngitis (ICD-9 464), bronchitis (ICD-9 466 and 490), URI NOS (ICD-9 465) and influenza that involves upper respiratory tract (ICD-9 487.1).

Exclusion

Any concurrent comorbidities in the recorded diagnoses

Follow-up visit of a prior ED visit

Age < 18 or >64 years

The dependent variables were 1) the prescription of antibiotics and 2) the prescription of imaging studies (X-ray and CT). Several factors that may be associated with the prescription of antibiotics and imaging were investigated. The factors were selected a priori based on results from previous studies and the availability of information in the NHAMCS data. The types of URIs were categorized as URI NOS, nasopharyngitis, laryngitis, bronchitis, influenza, and multiple URI diagnoses. Nasopharyngitis, laryngitis and influenza were combined due to small cell sizes. Vital signs at presentation included whether the temperature was >100.4 Fahrenheit, whether the patient had tachydcardia (heart rate > 100 beats per minute) and whether the patient had systolic blood pressure (SBP) > 160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >100 mmHg. Less than 20 patients had bradycardia (hear rate < 60 beats per minute) and pulse oximetry < 92%. Due to the concern of small cell sizes, bradycardia and oxygen saturation were not examined.

Characteristics of a visit included whether a patient presented with moderate or severe pain, waiting time to see a provider longer than 2 hours, whether a physician saw the patient, and the season. Patient demographic characteristics examined were age (41–64 vs. 18–40 years of age), sex, race, and ethnicity. Sources of payment were private insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, self-pay, and others. Sources of payment were not mutually exclusive because a patient may have multiple insurance types, for example, Medicare and private insurance. Geographic characteristics were Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) and region (Northeast, Midwest, South and West).

To achieve a sufficient sample size, 2007 and 2008 were combined, as done in previous studies of URIs using NHAMCS. The complex sampling design was controlled for in all analyses to provide nationally representative estimates. Statistical software SAS® (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and Stata ® (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX) were used to perform the analyses. First, the prescribing patterns of antibiotics and imaging were estimated. The most frequently prescribed antibiotic classes were then identified. Two multivariate logistic regressions were performed for prescribing antibiotics and imaging studies, respectively, to identify the effect of each independent variable, controlling for the confounding factors.

Results

In 2007 and 2008, there were 241 million ED visits in the US, out of which 2.2 million were adult uncomplicated URIs without any other concurrent diagnoses. Among all uncomplicated URI visits, about 52% (95% CI: 47-58%) had antibiotic prescriptions and 46% (95% CI: 40-52%) had X-ray. Less than 2% of the visits performed CT studies. Approximately 51% (95% CI: 46-57%) of these visits had a diagnosis of bronchitis, 35% (95% CI: 29-40%) had a diagnosis of URI NOS, 9% (95% CI: 5-10%) had nasopharyngitis, laryngitis or influenza, and 4% (95% CI: 2-7%) had multiple URI diagnoses.

Figure 1 reports the prescription rate of each antibiotic class. About 36% (95% CI: 31-42%) of the visits included macrolide prescriptions, with the vast majority being azithromycin. Roughly 5% (95% CI: 3-8%) had penicillin prescriptions, almost all of which were amoxicillin and amoxicillin/clavulanate. Nearly 5% (95% CI: 3-7%) prescribed quinolones, the most frequent being levofloxacin followed by moxifloxacin and ciprofloxacin. Approximately 4% (95% CI: 3-6%) used tetracyclines, almost all of which were doxycycline.

Figure 1
figure 1

Prevalence of antibiotic use.

Full size image

Descriptive statistics of the sample characteristics are shown in Table 1. Table 2 reports results from the multivariate analyses. Among statistically significant (p < 0.05) findings, the diagnosis of bronchitis and multiple URI diagnoses were more likely than URI NOS to be associated with antibiotic prescriptions. In addition, the diagnosis of bronchitis was more likely than the diagnosis of URI NOS to be associated with the ordering of imaging studies. Among vital signs, fever was found to be significantly associated with a higher likelihood of prescribing antibiotics.

Table 1 Descriptive statistics (n = 616)
Full size table
Table 2 Results from multivariate analyses (odds ratios) a (n = 616)
Full size table

Waiting time longer than 2 hours was significantly associated with increased odds of prescribing antibiotics. As compared with males, female patients were found to be less likely to get antibiotics. Middle-aged patients were more likely than their younger counterparts to receive imaging studies. Having private insurance or Medicare was significantly associated with imaging studies. MSA status was significantly associated with increased probabilities of receiving imaging studies.

Discussion

In spite of research evidence and guidelines on the management of uncomplicated URIs, over-prescribing of antibiotics and imaging studies, particularly plain radiography, persists. In 2000, over half of all ED visits for URIs had an antibiotic prescribed [2]. In 2005–2006, the antibiotic prescription rate reach 64% of URI visits in EDs [5]. Our study offered another piece of evidence that the overutilization of antibiotics in EDs continued into 2008, despite the growing concerns for antibiotic resistance and rising health care costs.

An early study reported that penicillins (13.1%), macrolides (25.8%), and cephalosporins (6.2%) were the most frequently prescribed antibiotics in 1995–2000 [1]. In 2005–2006, the prescription rate for penicillins and cephalosporins significantly decreased whereas that for macrolides increased from 1995–1996 [3]. Our study found that in 2007 and 2008, macrolide was the most frequently prescribed antibiotic class (35%) and penicillins were prescribed to only about 5% of the visits. Because of the differences in inclusion/exclusion criteria among the studies, the prescription prevalence rates are not directly comparable. However, it is evident that there have been changes in providers’ prescribing patterns.

The over-prescribing of macrolide, mostly azithromycin, may be attributable to its availability, low cost and microbial coverage. About 10% of adult pharyngitis cases are caused by Group A Hemolytic Streptococcus (GABHS). The most common organisms that cause community-acquired pneumonia include Streptococcus pneumoniae and Mycoplasma penumoniae. These three organisms, if not resistant, are sensitive to azithromycin. With the overlap of the symptoms of community-acquired pneumonia and upper respiratory infections, the increased use of azithromycin may be the result of diagnostic uncertainty and a shot-gun approach to treat the common respiratory symptoms seen in the EDs. Over time, many ED providers may have adopted this practice in treating the otherwise healthy patient population as a means to expedite patient disposition in response to increasing ED crowding and longer patient turn-over time.

The prescribing of antibiotics may also be associated with providers’ attempt to increase patient satisfaction [10–14]. In a study of 5 urban teaching hospital EDs, more treatments received in EDs was associated with a higher level of patient satisfaction, even after controlling for other confounding factors [15], although another study failed to demonstrate this association [16]. The current study found that longer waiting time was associated with prescribing antibiotics. This may have reflected ED providers’ efforts to prevent patient dissatisfaction rather than their propensity to prescribing antibiotics, for it was well demonstrated that waiting time in the EDs was a key predictor of patient satisfaction [15, 17–20].

In addition, the current study found that almost half of the URI visits had imaging studies, particularly X-ray. Because we selected the healthiest age group without concurrent conditions from the general ED patient population to construct the sample, such a high prevalence of the use would suggest overutilization of care. One of the key rationales for ordering imaging studies among patients with respiratory symptoms was to rule out pneumonia. The incidence of community acquired pneumonia among patients with respiratory symptoms was between 2.7% and 7% in the general population [21–24]. For adult 18–64 years of age without comorbidities, the incidence rate should be much lower.

The overuse of imaging raises the concern for radiation-linked cancers, longer visits, and higher visit cost. Perhaps the overutilization of imaging mirrors the current trend of favoring diagnostic tests over more subjective clinical skills in all specialties of medicine. Over the past years, ED physicians have become accustomed to the core measures of pneumonia treatment implemented by the Joint Commission and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (http://www.jointcommission.org/pneumomia). Because of the heightened awareness of the burden of missed diagnosis of pneumonia, it is possible that ED physicians may have extended the use of imaging appropriate for a population at higher risks, i.e., the elderly population, to a younger and healthier age group.

There are several limitations in the current study. First, readers need to exercise cautions in comparing the prevalence rates obtained from the current study with those from prior studies due to different inclusion/exclusion criteria. The current study aimed to examine providers’ compliance with CDC guidelines. Consequently, the simplest form of URIs without any comorbidities in the healthiest population (18–64 years of age) were selected to eliminate justifiable deviations from the guidelines. As the result, the current study may have underestimated the prevalence of antibiotic and imaging prescriptions in the overall population and the results cannot be generalized to the pediatric and elderly populations. This also highlights the need of expanding the guidelines to encompass prevalent comorbidities, particularly those affecting respiratory, cardiovascular and immune systems. As the prevalence of chronic conditions grows in the US population, more research and concerted efforts are warranted to refine the existing URI treatment guidelines to curtail the over-prescribing of antibiotics and imaging studies in the EDs. Second, physical findings were not present in the data; ordering of some of the tests may have been appropriate if certain physical findings, for example, crackles heard upon auscultation, were taken into consideration. Third, any limitations or inconsistences in the ICD-9 coding of patient visits would lead to biases that are inherent in all studies involving coding.

Despite the recommendations and campaign efforts by the CDC and many medical associations, the prescribing of antibiotics in treating uncomplicated URIs in the EDs remains prevalent. Furthermore, overutilization of imaging studies is prevalent. Changes at levels of health care system and hospitals are needed to avoid unnecessary resource utilization. In addition, further patient education about antibiotic use in the community may greatly facilitate the transition out of an antibiotic-dependent consumer culture.

Conclusion

Despite the recommendations and campaign efforts by the CDC and many medical associations, the prescribing of antibiotics in treating uncomplicated URIs in the EDs remains prevalent. Overutilization of imaging studies is also prevalent. Changes at levels of health care system and hospitals are needed to avoid unnecessary resource utilization. In addition, further patient education about antibiotic use in the community may greatly facilitate the transition out of an antibiotic-dependent consumer culture.

Ethics

The data used for this study were obtained from a public domain, CDC’ website, http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ahcd/ahcd_questionnaires.htm.

Consent

The data used for this study were obtained from a public domain, CDC’ website, http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ahcd/ahcd_questionnaires.htm.

References

  1. Thorpe JM, Smith SR, Trygstad TK: Trends in emergency department antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections. Ann Pharmacother. 2004, 38 (6): 928-935. 10.1345/aph.1D380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Roumie CL, Halasa NB, Grijalva CG: Trends in antibiotic prescribing for adults in the United States–1995 to 2002. J Gen Intern Med. 2005, 20 (8): 697-702. 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0148.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Grijalva CG, Nuorti JP, Griffin MR: Antibiotic prescription rates for acute respiratory tract infections in US ambulatory settings. JAMA. 2009, 302 (7): 758-766. 10.1001/jama.2009.1163.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Mainous AG, Hueston WJ, Davis MP, Pearson WS: Trends in antimicrobial prescribing for bronchitis and upper respiratory infections among adults and children. Am J Public Health. 2003, 93 (11): 1910-1914. 10.2105/AJPH.93.11.1910.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Steinman MA, Landefeld CS, Gonzales R: Predictors of broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections in adult primary care. JAMA. 2003, 289 (6): 719-725. 10.1001/jama.289.6.719.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Martinez FJ, Brennan-Martinez C, Flaherty KR: Bronchitis in the elderly: when and in whom to use antibiotics. Clin Geriatr. 2000, 8: 73-79.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Metlay JP, Kapoor WN, Fine MJ: Does this patient have community-acquired pneumonia? Diagnosing pneumonia by history and physical examination. JAMA. 1997, 278 (17): 1440-1445. 10.1001/jama.1997.03550170070035.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pek WY, Boushey HA: Cough in lower airway infections. Cough: causes, mechanisms and therapy. Edited by: Chung KF, Widdicombe JG, Boushey HA. 2003, Oxford: Blackwell Publications, 83-96.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shua-Haim JR, Ross JS: Pneumonia in the elderly. Clin Geriatr. 2000, 8: 45-49.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Braun BL, Fowles JB, Solberg L, Kind E, Healey M, Anderson R: Patient beliefs about the characteristics, causes, and care of the common cold: an update. J Fam Pract. 2000, 49 (2): 153-156.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hamm RM, Hicks RJ, Bemben DA: Antibiotics and respiratory infections: do antibiotic prescriptions improve outcomes?. J Okla State Med Assoc. 1996, 89 (8): 267-274.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee GM, Friedman JF, Ross-Degnan D, Hibberd PL, Goldmann DA: Misconceptions about colds and predictors of health service utilization. Pediatrics. 2003, 111 (2): 231-236. 10.1542/peds.111.2.231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mangione-Smith R, McGlynn EA, Elliott MN, Krogstad P, Brook RH: The relationship between perceived parental expectations and pediatrician antimicrobial prescribing behavior. Pediatrics. 1999, 103 (4 Pt 1): 711-718.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nyquist AC, Gonzales R, Steiner JF, Sande MA: Antibiotic prescribing for children with colds, upper respiratory tract infections, and bronchitis. JAMA. 1998, 279 (11): 875-877. 10.1001/jama.279.11.875.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sun BC, Adams J, Orav EJ, Rucker DW, Brennan TA, Burstin HR: Determinants of patient satisfaction and willingness to return with emergency care. Ann Emerg Med. 2000, 35 (5): 426-434.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ong S, Nakase J, Moran GJ, Karras DJ, Kuehnert MJ, Talan DA: Antibiotic use for emergency department patients with upper respiratory infections: prescribing practices, patient expectations, and patient satisfaction. Ann Emerg Med. 2007, 50 (3): 213-220. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.03.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McMullan JT, Veser FH: Emergency department volume and acuity as factors in patients leaving without treatment. South Med J. 2004, 97 (8): 729-733. 10.1097/00007611-200408000-00006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pines JM, Garson C, Baxt WG, Rhodes KV, Shofer FS, Hollander JE: ED crowding is associated with variable perceptions of care compromise. Acad Emerg Med. 2007, 14 (12): 1176-1181. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2007.tb02340.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pines JM, Iyer S, Disbot M, Hollander JE, Shofer FS, Datner EM: The effect of emergency department crowding on patient satisfaction for admitted patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2008, 15 (9): 825-831. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00200.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vieth TL, Rhodes KV: The effect of crowding on access and quality in an academic ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2006, 24 (7): 787-794. 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.03.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Diehr P, Wood RW, Bushyhead J, Krueger L, Wolcott B, Tompkins RK: Prediction of pneumonia in outpatients with acute cough–a statistical approach. J Chronic Dis. 1984, 37 (3): 215-225. 10.1016/0021-9681(84)90149-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Emerman CL, Dawson N, Speroff T: Comparison of physician judgment and decision aids for ordering chest radiographs for pneumonia in outpatients. Ann Emerg Med. 1991, 20 (11): 1215-1219. 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)81474-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Macfarlane J, Holmes W, Gard P: Prospective study of the incidence, aetiology and outcome of adult lower respiratory tract illness in the community. Thorax. 2001, 56 (2): 109-114. 10.1136/thorax.56.2.109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Metlay JP, Stafford RS, Singer DE: National trends in the use of antibiotics by primary care physicians for adult patients with cough. Arch Intern Med. 1998, 158 (16): 1813-1818. 10.1001/archinte.158.16.1813.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was supported in part by Ambrose Monell Foundation. Points of view or opinions expressed in this study do not necessarily represent official policy of Ambrose Monell Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Family & Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA

    K Tom Xu, Irvin Sulapas & Justin Berk

  2. Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA

    John Baldwin

  3. Pharm D. Candidate, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA

    Omar Martinez

  4. CHRISTUS Spohn Hospital - Memorial, Department of Emergency Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 2606 Hospital Blvd, Corpus Christi, TX, 78405, USA

    K Tom Xu & Daniel Roberts

Authors
  1. K Tom Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel Roberts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Irvin Sulapas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Omar Martinez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Justin Berk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. John Baldwin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K Tom Xu.

Additional information

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

KTX and JoB conceived the study. KTX performed data analyses. KTX, DR, IS, OM, JuB and JoB contributed to literature review, the interpretation of the results and the writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, K.T., Roberts, D., Sulapas, I. et al. Over-prescribing of antibiotics and imaging in the management of uncomplicated URIs in emergency departments. BMC Emerg Med 13, 7 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-13-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-13-7

Keywords

BMC Emergency Medicine

ISSN: 1471-227X

Contact us