Consensus on items and quantities of clinical equipment required to deal with a mass casualties big bang incident: a national Delphi study
© Duncan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 18 July 2013
Accepted: 18 February 2014
Published: 22 February 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|18 Jul 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 Aug 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Shirley|
|18 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ebbe Billmann Thorgersen|
|31 Jan 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Edward Duncan|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|31 Jan 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ebbe Billmann Thorgersen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Feb 2014||Editorially accepted|
|22 Feb 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-227X-14-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.