Which diagnostic tests are most useful in a chest pain unit protocol?
© Goodacre et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
Received: 27 January 2005
Accepted: 25 August 2005
Published: 25 August 2005
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|27 Jan 2005||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|22 Mar 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Feldman|
|7 Apr 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Grant Innes|
|7 Apr 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joseph Murphy|
|23 May 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Steve Goodacre|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 May 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 May 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Feldman|
|13 Jun 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joseph Murphy|
|14 Jul 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Grant Innes|
|11 Aug 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Steve Goodacre|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Aug 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Aug 2005||Editorially accepted|
|25 Aug 2005||Article published||10.1186/1471-227X-5-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.