Impact of introducing multiple evidence-based clinical practice protocols in a medical intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study
© Afessa et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 08 January 2007
Accepted: 08 August 2007
Published: 08 August 2007
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Jan 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 May 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maurizia Capuzzo|
|4 Jun 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Judith Jacobi|
|17 Jun 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Bekele Afessa|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Jun 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Jul 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maurizia Capuzzo|
|28 Jul 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Bekele Afessa|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|28 Jul 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|1 Aug 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Bekele Afessa|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|1 Aug 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|8 Aug 2007||Editorially accepted|
|8 Aug 2007||Article published||10.1186/1471-227X-7-10|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.