Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Saudi SCD patients’ symptoms and quality of life relative to the number of ED visits

BMC Emergency Medicine volume 16, Article number: 30 (2016) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Individuals living with sickle cell disease (SCD) have significantly increased emergency department (ED) use compared to the general population. In Saudi Arabia, health care is free for all individuals and therefore has no bearing on increased ED visits. However, little is known about the relationship between quality of life (QoL) and frequency of acute care utilization in this patient population.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted on 366 patients with SCD who attended the outpatient department at King Fahad Hospital, Hofuf, Saudi Arabia. Data were collected through self-administered surveys, which included: demographics, SCD-related ED visits, clinical issues, and QoL levels. We assessed the ED use by asking for the number of SCD-related ED visits within a 6-month period.

Results

The self-report survey of ED visits was completed by 308 SCD patients. The median number of SCD-related ED visits within a 6-month time period (IQR) was four (2-7 visits). According to the unadjusted negative binomial model, the rate of SCD-related ED visits increased by (46, 39.3, 40, and 53.5 %) for patients with fever, skin redness with itching, swelling, and blood transfusion, respectively. Poor QoL tends to increase the rate of SCD-related ED visits. Well education and poor general health positively influenced the rate of SCD-related ED visits. Well education tends to increase the rate of SCD-related ED visits by 50.2 %. The rate of SCD-related ED visits decreased by 1.4 % for every point increase in general health.

Conclusion

Saudi patients with sickle cell disease reported a wide range of SCD-related ED visits. It was estimated that six of 10 SCD patients had at least three ED visits within a 6-month period. Well education and poor general health resulted in an increase in the rate of SCD-related ED visits.

Peer Review reports

Background

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is comprised of a group of inherited red blood cell disorders characterized by the presence of abnormal hemoglobin. SCD is present throughout Saudi Arabia, mostly in the eastern and southern provinces. Information about the prevalence of SCD in Saudi Arabia is not well established, but studies to date have reported that SCD is a relatively common genetic disorder in this part of the world [1–3].

The clinical manifestations of SCD often lead the patient to visit the emergency department [4–8]. The most common manifestation of SCD is vaso-occlusive crisis, which can cause a multitude of major organ complications as well as result in recurrent painful episodes [7, 9–14]. This increases the risks for infections and other health complications that require emergency intervention [15–17]. In particular, high rates of ED utilization have been reported in single and multi-institutional studies [4, 6, 7, 11, 18–24]. The predictors of frequent ED utilization are not fully understood [20], but the following variables have been found to be associated with higher ED and hospital utilization: (1) the more severe disease and disease-related complications, (2) the need for pain crisis management [25], (3) higher white blood cell counts, (4) lower hemoglobin levels, (5) asthma, (6) being publically insured, (7) being 18 to 30 years old, and (8) the inability to obtain follow-up appointments with hematology. Within these presentations, pain is the most common complication of SCD requiring ED visits and hospitalization.

Our patients with SCD receive healthcare by routinely visiting primary care physicians for health checkups, managing pain, and urine/blood tests. Many of these patients do not have an assigned hematologist to provide counseling or advice on pain management. However, primary care physicians may make referrals to the Hematology Outpatient Clinic where necessary. Although healthcare is free to all individuals in Saudi Arabia, it is unknown whether all affected patients have access to a disease specialist.

Because the health system in Saudi Arabia provides free access to the Saudi population, patients with SCD have access not only to specialized health care but also to home pain medications. This includes over-the-counter pain medications such as Advil, Tylenol, etc. to control mild pain at home. Saudi SCD patients may have opioid pain medication available at home upon doctor prescription. At the ED, patients may request prescriptions for stronger medicines such as opioid medications, including morphine, tramadol, hydrocodone, methadone, fentanyl, codeine, and meperidine. However, as is the case with any chronic disease, patient compliance continues to be an important issue.

Self-report measurements of pain and wellbeing as measured by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) may predict frequent ED visits in patients with SCD. Increased life expectancy due to recent medical advances has increased the need to understand more fully the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) [26] in patients with SCD [2]. Previous research has indicated that patients with SCD experience a lower HRQoL [1, 2, 25, 27–33] compared to the general adult population. A number of disease-related factors have been found to affect HRQoL in patients with SCD. These can develop into life-threatening complications as well as extensive organ damage, reducing both quality of life (QoL) and life expectancy. A clinically important reduction in the HRQoL and the presence of other prognostic factors can further contribute to determining the reasons for ED visits [34].

The presence of complications and risk factors may also raise the risk level of ED visits in patients with SCD, such as swelling in the hands or feet, fever, blood transfusion, and family history of anemia. The current investigation studied a sample of SCD patients from Saudi Arabia to assess the frequency of ED use and its relation to patients’ symptoms and QoL.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study of patients with SCD who attended the outpatient clinic of a local hospital in Saudi Arabia from October 1, 2014 to February 29, 2015. Participants of the study were adult patients with SCD who were treated in the Inherited Blood Disorder Center, King Fahad Hospital (KFH) - Hofuf, Eastern Region, Saudi Arabia. KFH - Hofuf is the main hospital in the Al-Ahsa region in eastern Saudi Arabia. Serving about one and a half million people from the general population of Al-Ahsa, it receives cases from Al-Ahsa region health centers and government and private hospitals.

The study population was composed of SCD patients who were attending for a follow-up visit to the Hematology Outpatient Clinic. This study was approved by the Ministry of Health, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (IRB Log No. 15-247E) and King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Research Protocol - RC12/127/R. The study conducted an anonymous survey of patients with SCD, and no identifiable data were collected from the patients. Only patients who agreed to participate in the study were asked to complete and return the survey.

Patients’ characteristics—such as age, gender, frequency of ED visits, marital status, employment, and education level—were collected. The following clinical characteristics were assessed: duration of illness, obesity, chronic disease other than SCD, and whether the patient had a history of inherited anemia and a history of blood transfusion. Complications and symptoms of SCD within the past 6 months were assessed through self-report, such as fever and swelling of the hands or feet. Since skin redness with itching can be a result of infections or side effects from certain SCD medications, and skin redness with itching can be a potential indicator of poor QoL, the study collected data on this characteristic as well. We evaluated the frequency of ED visits by asking for the number of SCD-related ED visits within the past six months. A validated and Arabic-translated RAND-36 measure of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire [35] was also administered to the study participants. Patients rated their HRQoL in terms of their feelings and perceptions with regard to eight different components: physical function; physical role health; emotional role functions; vitality; emotional wellbeing; social function; bodily pain; and general health perceptions. Each scale scored from 0 = least favorable health state to 100 = most favorable health state. The Arabic version of RAND-36 HRQoL was found to be reliable [36]. More details of the study are discussed by Ahmed et al. [36]. A total of 450 surveys were distributed (81.3 % response rate), and 366 were returned.

Statistical analysis

The data analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics (20; SPSS, Chicago, IL). Descriptive statistics were used to describe continuous and categorical variables (Table 1). We used negative binomial regression model to identify the risk factors associated with the high rate of SCD-related ED visits (Table 2). We assessed the adequacy of multivariate regression model by comparing the deviance and the log likelihood for negative binomial and Poisson regression models. In all analyses, P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Table 1 Participant characteristics
Full size table
Table 2 Factors associated with the rate of SCD-related ED visits
Full size table

Results

Of 366 patients, 58 (15.8 %) chose not to report their SCD-related ED utilization within the past six months, thus the self-report of SCD-related ED visits was completed by 308 SCD patients. Of the 308 SCD patients, only 21 (6.8 %) reported no SCD-related ED visits, 28 (9.1 %) reported one SCD-related ED visit, and 61 (19.8 %) reported two SCD-related ED visits. The majority of our samples, 198 (64.3 %), reported three or more SCD-related ED visits over the past 6 months (95 % confidence limit: 58.7–69.6 %). The median number of SCD-related ED visits was four (IQR 2–7) with ranges between 0 and 87 visits.

The SCD patients’ average age was 29 (SD = 10.5) years, with 74.6 % being male and 35.7 % reporting regular exercise. Table 2 shows the factors associated with the rate of SCD-related ED visits. Unadjusted analyses show that the rate of SCD-related ED visits was higher for the male gender (RR: 1.329 [95 % CI: 1.001–1.768, P = 0.050]), married (RR: 1.413 [95 % CI: 1.106–1.804, P = 0.006]), fever (RR: 1.460 [95 % CI: 1.146–1.860, P = 0.002]), skin redness with itching (RR: 1.393 [95 % CI: 1.080–1.796, P = 0.011]), swelling (RR: 1.4 [95 % CI: 1.094–1.792, P = 0.007]), blood transfusion (RR: 1.535 [95 % CI: 1.165–2.023, P = 0.002]), and older age (RR: 1.013 [95 % CI: 1.001–1.025, P = 0.034]).

The rate of SCD-related ED visits was less for unemployed patients (RR: 0.745 [95 % CI: 0.577–0.962, P = 0.024]). The rate of SCD-related ED visits decreased for every point increase in physical function (RR: 0.993 [95 % CI: 0.988–0.998, P = 0.010]), physical role functions (RR: 0.994 [95 % CI: 0.991–0.998, P = 0.001]), emotional role functions (RR: 0.996 [95 % CI: 0.993–0.999, P = 0.007]), vitality (RR: 0.988 [95 % CI: 0.981–0.995, P = 0.001]), social function (RR: 0.991 [95 % CI: 0.986–0.996, P = 0.001]), and general health (RR: 0.982 [95 % CI: 0.975–0.989, P = 0.001]). The rate of SCD-related ED visits decreased for every point decrease in bodily pain (RR: 0.992 [95 % CI: 0.988–0.997, P = 0.001]).

Adjusted analysis in Table 2 shows the factors associated with the high rate of SCD-related ED visits. According to the multivariable negative binomial regression model, the rate of SCD-related ED visits was much higher for those with a university degree (RR: 1.502 [95 % CI: 1.050–2.149, P = 0.026]). The rate of SCD-related ED visits decreased for every point increase in general health (RR: 0.986 [95 % CI: 0.975–0.998, P = 0.018]).

The deviance value for the negative binomial regression model was near to1.0 (0.96), while for a Poisson regression model was (6.937). The log likelihood was smaller for the Poisson regression model compared to the negative binomial regression model ( −1066.150 vs. −644.880), which indicates the negative binomial regression model may be appropriate.

Discussion

This study represents the first investigation in the entire Arabic world on SCD patients’ symptoms and QoL relative to the number of their SCD-related ED visits. We found that the frequent SCD-related ED utilization (three SCD-related ED visits or greater within a 6-month time period) was very prevalent in the Saudi population, with 64.3 % (95 % confidence limit: 58.7–69.6 %). A small number of sickle cell patients (28.9 %) reported between one and two SCD-related ED visits within a 6-month time period, while (6.8 %) reported no SCD-related ED visits. Previous studies, which were based on a daily diary of ED utilization for pain management and other related causes, reported 15–35.5 % of the patients with SCD had three or more ED visits per year [8, 37, 38]. The current investigation showed higher rates of ED utilization than what has been reported in these studies.

A retrospective exploratory chart review study found that SCD patients with multiple ED visits in the past 12 months reported significantly higher pain scores [39]. Given that the methodology of Marco CA et al. was different compared to that of the present study, our unadjusted analysis is in line with their findings that the rate of SCD-related ED visits increased because of pain. A survey with similar methodology to our study was conducted by the CDC National Center for Health Statistics, which reported pain as the most common reason for the ED visit [40]. Another prospective study reported nearly 37 % of ED use was because of painful episodes [41].

A retrospective study suggested that poorer physical HRQoL domains were significantly correlated to more healthcare utilization events [42]. Our unadjusted analyses confirmed these findings: all dimensions of HRQoL were found to be predictors of high rates of SCD-related ED visits except emotional well-being. According to our unadjusted analyses, patients with clinical symptoms such as fever, skin redness with itching, swelling, or blood transfusion tend to have high rates of SCD-related ED visits. These findings are in agreement with Yusuf HR et al. [40] and Koshy M et al. [41], which have cited fever as a reason for ED visits in patients with SCD.

In the multivariate negative binomial regression model, the rate of SCD-related ED visits (50.2 % were higher for SCD patients with a university degree. Using an increase in general health ratings by a score of 1, the rate of SCD-related ED visits decreased by 1.4 %.

Several methodological limitations could narrow our interpretations: The study was based on a cross-sectional design, and therefore provides more data about association than causation. ED utilization was based on self-reporting, not on a retrospective or prospective chart review for each visit. Our sample recruited from SCD patients who attended an outpatient clinic for a follow-up visit, which may not represent the entire SCD population. Some modifiable factors were not taken into consideration, such as having a hematologist, or struggling with financial or transportation issues. Despite these limitations, this is the first study that has reported the ED utilization in patients with SCD in the entire Arab region. While our study highlights ED utilization in SCD patients, and despite its limitations, this is the first study to highlight predictors of ED visits among the population of Saudi Arabian SCD patients. The findings that the level of educational attainment and poorer general health are independent risk factors of SCD-related ED visits can assist medical professionals in informing and educating SCD patients about disease management.

Conclusions

Saudi patients with sickle cell disease reported a wide range of SCD-related ED visits. It was estimated that six of 10 SCD patients had at least three ED visits within a 6-month period. Well education and poor general health resulted in an increase in the rate of SCD-related ED visits. These findings can contribute to medical practitioners’ ability to manage and educate patients with SCD.

Abbreviations

ED:

Emergency department

HRQoL:

Health-related quality of life

QoL:

Quality of life

SCD:

Sickle cell disease

SF-36:

36-Item Short Form Health Survey

References

  1. Amr MA, Amin TT, Al-Omair OA. Health related quality of life among adolescents with sickle cell disease in Saudi Arabia. Pan Afr Med J. 2011;8:10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Al Jaouni SK, Al Muhayawi MS, Halawa TF, Al Mehayawi MS. Treatment adherence and quality of life outcomes in patients with sickle cell disease. Saudi Med J. 2013;34(3):261–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jastaniah W. Epidemiology of sickle cell disease in Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med. 2011;31(3):289–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith WR, Coyne P, Smith VS, Mercier B. Temperature changes, temperature extremes, and their relationship to emergency department visits and hospitalizations for sickle cell crisis. Pain Manag Nurs. 2003;4(3):106–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wolfson JA, Schrager SM, Coates TD, Kipke MD. Sickle-cell disease in California: a population-based description of emergency department utilization. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;56(3):413–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Po C, Colombatti R, Cirigliano A, Da Dalt L, Agosto C, Benini F, et al. The management of sickle cell pain in the emergency department: a priority for health systems. Clin J Pain. 2013;29(1):60–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Frush K, Ware RE, Kinney TR. Emergency department visits by children with sickle hemoglobinopathies: factors associated with hospital admission. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1995;11(1):9–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aisiku IP, Smith WR, McClish DK, Levenson JL, Penberthy LT, Roseff SD, et al. Comparisons of high versus low emergency department utilizers in sickle cell disease. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;53(5):587–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brandow AM, Brousseau DC, Pajewski NM, Panepinto JA. Vaso-occlusive painful events in sickle cell disease: impact on child wellbeing. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010;54(1):92–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Wolfson JA, Schrager SM, Khanna R, Coates TD, Kipke MD. Sickle cell disease in California: sociodemographic predictors of emergency department utilization. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012;58(1):66–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Darbari DS, Wang Z, Kwak M, Hildesheim M, Nichols J, Allen D, et al. Severe painful vaso-occlusive crises and mortality in a contemporary adult sickle cell anemia cohort study. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e79923.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Badaki-Makun O, Scott JP, Panepinto JA, Casper TC, Hillery CA, Dean JM, et al. Intravenous magnesium for pediatric sickle cell vaso-occlusive crisis: methodological issues of a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014;61(6):1049–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hardwick Jr WE, Givens TG, Monroe KW, King WD, Lawley D. Effect of ketorolac in pediatric sickle cell vaso-occlusive pain crisis. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1999;15(3):179–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Italia K, Jain D, Gattani S, Jijina F, Nadkarni A, Sawant P, et al. Hydroxyurea in sickle cell disease--a study of clinico-pharmacological efficacy in the Indian haplotype. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2009;42(1):25–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Uzunel M, Remberger M, Sairafi D, Hassan Z, Mattsson J, Omazic B, et al. Unrelated versus related allogeneic stem cell transplantation after reduced intensity conditioning. Transplantation. 2006;82(7):913–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wethers DL. Sickle cell disease in childhood: Part II. Diagnosis and treatment of major complications and recent advances in treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2000;62(6):1309–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jenkins TL. Sickle cell anemia in the pediatric intensive care unit: novel approaches for managing life-threatening complications. AACN Clin Issues. 2002;13(2):154–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith WR, Penberthy LT, Bovbjerg VE, McClish DK, Roberts JD, Dahman B, et al. Summaries for patients. Pain and health care visits in patients with sickle cell disease. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(2):I36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rogovik AL, Persaud J, Friedman JN, Kirby MA, Goldman RD. Pediatric vasoocclusive crisis and weather conditions. J Emerg Med. 2011;41(5):559–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stein DM, Flum AS, Cashy J, Zhao LC, McVary KT. Nationwide emergency department visits for priapism in the United States. J Sex Med. 2013;10(10):2418–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shatin D, Levin R, Ireys HT, Haller V. Health care utilization by children with chronic illnesses: a comparison of medicaid and employer-insured managed care. Pediatrics. 1998;102(4):E44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shankar SM, Arbogast PG, Mitchel E, Ding H, Wang WC, Griffin MR. Impact of proximity to comprehensive sickle cell center on utilization of healthcare services among children with sickle cell disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008;50(1):66–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dampier C, LeBeau P, Rhee S, Lieff S, Kesler K, Ballas S, et al. Health-related quality of life in adults with sickle cell disease (SCD): a report from the comprehensive sickle cell centers clinical trial consortium. Am J Hematol. 2011;86(2):203–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Krishnamurti L, Smith-Packard B, Gupta A, Campbell M, Gunawardena S, Saladino R. Impact of individualized pain plan on the emergency management of children with sickle cell disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014;61(10):1747–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Anie KA, Grocott H, White L, Dzingina M, Rogers G, Cho G. Patient self-assessment of hospital pain, mood and health-related quality of life in adults with sickle cell disease. BMJ Open. 2012;2(4) doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001274.

  26. Anie KA, Steptoe A, Bevan DH. Sickle cell disease: pain, coping and quality of life in a study of adults in the UK. Br J Health Psychol. 2002;7(Part 3):331–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bonner MJ. Health related quality of life in sickle cell disease: just scratching the surface. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010;54(1):1–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Panepinto JA, Bonner M. Health-related quality of life in sickle cell disease: past, present, and future. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012;59(2):377–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fisak B, Belkin MH, von Lehe AC, Bansal MM. The relation between health-related quality of life, treatment adherence and disease severity in a paediatric sickle cell disease sample. Child Care Health Dev. 2012;38(2):204–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vilela RQ, Cavalcante JC, Cavalcante BF, Araujo DL, Lobo Mde M, Nunes FA. Quality of life of individuals with sickle cell disease followed at referral centers in Alagoas, Brazil. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2012;34(6):442–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Asnani MR, Reid ME, Ali SB, Lipps G, Williams-Green P. Quality of life in patients with sickle cell disease in Jamaica: rural-urban differences. Rural Remote Health. 2008;8(2):890.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. McClish DK, Penberthy LT, Bovbjerg VE, Roberts JD, Aisiku IP, Levenson JL, Roseff SD, Smith WR. Health related quality of life in sickle cell patients: the PiSCES project. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Panepinto JA. Health-related quality of life in sickle cell disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008;51(1):5–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Panepinto JA, Pajewski NM, Foerster LM, Sabnis S, Hoffmann RG. Impact of family income and sickle cell disease on the health-related quality of life of children. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(1):5–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Coons SJ, Alabdulmohsin SA, Draugalis JR, Hays RD. Reliability of an Arabic version of the RAND 36-Item Health Survey and its equivalence to the US-English version. Med Care. 1998;36:428–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ahmed AE, Alaskar AS, Al-Suliman AM, Jazieh AR, McClish DK, Al Salamah M, Ali YZ, Malhan H, Mendoza MA, Gorashi AO, El-toum ME. Health-related quality of life in patients with sickle cell disease in Saudi Arabia. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Brousseau DC, Owens PL, Mosso AL, Panepinto JA, Steiner CA. Acute care utilization and rehospitalizations for sickle cell disease. JAMA. 2010;303(13):1288–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tanabe P, Artz N, Mark Courtney D, Martinovich Z, Weiss KB, Zvirbulis E, Hafner JW. Adult emergency department patients with sickle cell pain crisis: a learning collaborative model to improve analgesic management. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(4):399–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Marco CA, Kanitz W, Jolly M. Pain scores among emergency department (ED) patients: comparison by ED diagnosis. J Emerg Med. 2013;44(1):46–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yusuf HR, Atrash HK, Grosse SD, Parker CS, Grant AM. Emergency department visits made by patients with sickle cell disease: a descriptive study, 1999–2007. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(4):S536–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Koshy M, Leikin J, Dorn L, Lebby T, Talischy N, Telfert MC. Evaluation and management of sickle cell disease in the emergency department (AN 18-YEAR EXPERIENCE): 1974-1992. Am J Ther. 1994;1(4):309–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Jackson JL, Lemanek KL, Clough-Paabo E, Rhodes M. Predictors of health-related quality of life over time among adolescents and young adults with sickle cell disease. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2014;21(4):313–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The data collection of the study was supported by King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We would like to thank Huda Salman, Abdulla Al-Salman, and Zakaria Ali Sharidah for collecting the data for this study.

Availability of data and material

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is included within the article and its additional files.

Authors’ contributions

AEA and DKM were involved in the designing, analyzing, and writing stages of the study. ASA, AMA, AMA, and HMM were involved in revising and drafting the manuscript. MA and YZA were involved in data cleaning, preparation, and analysis. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was received from the Ministry of Health, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (IRB Log No-15-247E) and King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Research Protocol (RC12/127/R). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, College of Public Health and Health Informatics, MC 2350, P.O.Box 22490, Riyadh, 11426, KSA, Saudi Arabia

    Anwar E. Ahmed & Ahmed S. Alaskar

  2. King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Anwar E. Ahmed & Ahmed S. Alaskar

  3. King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Ahmed S. Alaskar & Yosra Z. Ali

  4. Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA

    Donna K. McClish

  5. National Anti-Corruption Commission, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Mohammed H. Aldughither

  6. King Fahad Hospital, Hofuf, Saudi Arabia

    Ahmad M. Al-Suliman

  7. King Fahad Central Hospital, Jazan, Saudi Arabia

    Hafiz M. Malhan

Authors
  1. Anwar E. Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ahmed S. Alaskar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Donna K. McClish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yosra Z. Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mohammed H. Aldughither
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ahmad M. Al-Suliman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hafiz M. Malhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anwar E. Ahmed.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmed, A.E., Alaskar, A.S., McClish, D.K. et al. Saudi SCD patients’ symptoms and quality of life relative to the number of ED visits. BMC Emerg Med 16, 30 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-016-0096-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-016-0096-z

Keywords

BMC Emergency Medicine

ISSN: 1471-227X

Contact us