Skip to main content

Table 3 Mediation effect on decision delay stratified by gender

From: Gender disparities in the mediating role of symptom knowledge level in reducing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) decision delay: Findings from a community-based study in China

Exposure

Gender

Model 1a

Model 2b

Model 3c

Total effect

(OR,95%CI, P)

Assoc. Mediator

(β,95%CI, P)

Mediation effect

(%, P)

Direct effect

(OR,95%CI, P)

Past ACS exposure

Male

0.54

(0.39–0.75, P < 0.001)

0.63

(0.15–1.11, P = 0.010)

17.39 P < 0.001

0.48

(0.33–0.70, P = 0.002)

 

Female

0.69

(0.48–0.99, P = 0.048)

0.42

(0.08–0.75, P = 0.015)

24.01 P = 0.48

0.94

(0.73–1.22, P = 0.644)

(1) Prior exposure to training programs

Male

0.64

(0.42–0.98, P = 0.036)

0.59

(0.13–1.26, P = 0.041)

23.63 P = 0.02

0.70

(0.45–1.08, P = 0.103)

 

Female

0.87

(0.64–1.21, P = 0.417)

0.57

(0.13–1.02, P = 0.012)

37.08 P = 0.44

0.93

(0.67–1.30, P = 0.667)

(2) Ever witness ACS in families

Male

0.64

(0.45–0.90, P = 0.011)

0.58

(0.04–1.12, P = 0.035)

18.38 P = 0.04

0.58

(0.42–0.80, P < 0.001)

 

Female

0.71

(0.52–0.97, P = 0.0313)

0.43

(0.05–0.80, P = 0.026)

16.75 P = 0.08

0.80

(0.60–1.06, P = 0.111)

(3) Ever personally experienced ACS

Male

0.84

(0.56–1.27, P = 0.401)

0.56

(−0.07–1.19, P = 0.083)

29.99 P = 0.32

0.91

(0.60–1.40, P = 0.674)

 

Female

1.11

(0.73–1.72, P = 0.633)

0.09

(−0.47–0.65, P = 0.757)

4.4 P = 0.84

1.13

(0.74–1.75, P = 0.587)

  1. a Model 1 assessed the total effect of past ACS exposure (as a whole) and its three elements on decision delay, stratified by gender, with adjustments for age, education, job category, and monthly income
  2. b Model 2 assessed the association between past ACS exposure (as a whole), its three elements and ACS symptom knowledge, stratified by gender, with adjustments for age, education, job category, and monthly income
  3. c Model 3 assessed the mediation via knowledge from past ACS exposure (as a whole), its three elements to decision delay, stratified by gender, with adjustments for age, education, job category, and monthly income. The estimate of mediation effect and its statistical significance was based on 1000 times of bootstrapping