Skip to main content

Table 2 Agreement between patients and surrogates for hypothetical stroke scenarios

From: The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: informed consent in hypothetical acute stroke scenarios

Scenario 1: TPA vs. no treatment

Scenario 2: TPA vs. clot removal procedure

Scenario 3: TPA vs. standard RCT

Scenario 4: TPA vs. adaptive RCT

 

Patients

 

Patients

 

Patients

 

Patients

Proxies

Would you want TPA?

Yes

No

Proxies

Would you want the procedure?

Yes

No

Proxies

Would you want the trial?

Yes

No

Proxies

Would you want the trial?

Yes

No

Yes

95.5% (n = 191)

2% (n = 4)

Yes

1% (n = 2)

4.5% (n = 9)

Yes

4.5% (n = 9)

9% (n = 18)

Yes

28.5% (n = 57)

21.5% (n = 43)

No

2% (n = 4)

0.5% (n = 1)

No

8.5% (n = 17)

86% (n = 172)

No

17% (n = 34)

69.5% (n = 139)

No

29.5% (n = 59)

20.5% (n = 41)

 

Mean

SD

 

Mean

SD

 

Mean

SD

 

Mean

SD

Patient confidence

8.0

2.1

Patient confidence

8.1

2

Patient confidence

8.0

1.9

Patient confidence

7.8

1.9

Proxy confidence

8.5

1.7

Proxy confidence

8.5

1.9

Proxy confidence

8.4

1.9

Proxy confidence

8.0

1.9

Proxy certainty

8.4

1.9

Proxy certainty

8.0

2.2

Proxy certainty

7.8

2.3

Proxy certainty

7.5

2.1

Cohen’s Kappa statistic

0.18

Cohen’s Kappa statistic

0.07

Cohen’s Kappa statistic

0.11

Cohen’s Kappa statistic

-0.02

AC1 (95% CI)

0.96 (0.93-0.99)

AC1 (95% CI)

0.87 (0.79-0.91)

AC1 (95% CI)

0.63 (0.53-0.74)

AC1 (95% CI)

-0.01 (-0.13 – 0.13)

  1. Overall agreement is observed in the bolded diagonal cells (i.e for scenario 1: 96% of patients and proxies agreed). Counts and proportions listed for all scenarios. Patient and surrogate confidence was measured on a 10 point Likert scale. SD = standard deviation. tPA = tissue plasminogen activator. RCT = Randomized controlled trial. AC1 = Gwet’s agreement coefficient. CI = confidence interval.