Skip to main content

Table 2 Teamwork self-assessment tool: TeamMonitor (modified mayo high performance teamwork scale)

From: Reliability of team-based self-monitoring in critical events: a pilot study

 

Use the following scale to rate the team on each dimension:

0 = never/rarely

1 = inconsistently

2 = consistently

na = not applicable

1

Do you feel that the leader was recognized by all team members?

   

0

1

2

na

2

Do you think the leader assured maintenance of an appropriate balance between command authority and team member participation?

   

0

1

2

na

3

Do you feel that each team member prompted each other to attend to all significant clinical indicators throughout the scenario?

   

0

1

2

na

4

Do you think team members prompted each other to attend to all significant clinical indicators throughout the scenario?

   

0

1

2

na

5

Do you think team members verbalized their activities loud when they were actively involved with the patient?

   

0

1

2

na

6

Do you feel that team members repeated back or paraphrased instructions and clarifications to indicate that they heard them correctly?

   

0

1

2

na

7

Do you feel that disagreement or conflicts among team members were addressed without a loss situation awareness?

   

0

1

2

na

8

Do you think roles were shifted to address urgent or emergent events when appropriate?

   

0

1

2

na

9

Do you think team members responded to potential errors or complications with procedures that avoided the error or complication?

   

0

1

2

na

  1. Comments: Please rate conservatively: Most teams that have not worked extensively together do not demonstrate many of the qualities.