Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Negative predictive value and potential cost savings of acute nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging in low risk patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: A prospective single blinded study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Jul 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 Jul 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alfredo Jose Mansur
15 Aug 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Avijit Lahiri
17 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jakob Lundager Forberg
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jakob Lundager Forberg
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
18 Mar 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Avijit Lahiri
5 Apr 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jakob Lundager Forberg
Resubmission - Version 5
5 Apr 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
8 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jakob Lundager Forberg
Resubmission - Version 6
8 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
19 Jun 2009 Editorially accepted
19 Jun 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-227X-9-12

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement