Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of the Airtraq ® and Truview ® laryngoscopes to the Macintosh laryngoscope for use by Advanced Paramedics in easy and simulated difficult intubation in manikins

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Sep 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Sep 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Malcolm Woollard
1 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Koichi Maruyama
21 Nov 2008 Author responded Author comments - John Laffey
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Nov 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Dec 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Malcolm Woollard
31 Dec 2008 Author responded Author comments - John Laffey
Resubmission - Version 3
31 Dec 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
26 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Malcolm Woollard
7 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - John Laffey
Resubmission - Version 7
7 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
13 Feb 2009 Editorially accepted
13 Feb 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-227X-9-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement