Skip to main content

Table 3 Responses of participants in BL arm on their e-Learning experience

From: Implementing blended learning in emergency airway management training: a randomized controlled trial

No

Item

Mean*

S.D.*

Likert scale response [N (%)] **

 

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Missing data

1

To do well in the on-line quizzes all you really need is a good memory.

3.31

0.263

1 (6.7)

2 (13.3)

12 (80.0)

2

The teacher used the on-line environment when appropriate to keep students informed about results.

3.77

0.166

0 (0.0)

4 (26.7)

11 (73.3)

3

I received too much feedback on-line from my teacher.

2.62

0.180

4 (26.6)

10 (66.6)

0 (0.0)

1

4

The teacher’s responses on-line motivated me to learn more deeply.

3.85

0.191

0 (0.0)

4 (26.6)

10 (66.6)

1

5

The teacher helped to guide on-line discussions between students

4.00

0.160

0 (0.0)

2 (13.3)

13 (86.7)

6

The teacher used the on-line environment to regularly update students about relevant unit of study information.

4.08

0.178

0 (0.0)

2 (13.3)

13 (86.7)

7

Reading other students’ on-line submissions clarified some of my own ideas.

3.46

0.215

1 (6.7)

6 (40.0)

8 (53.3)

8

The on-line teaching materials in this unit of study are extremely good at explaining things.

3.92

0.239

1 (6.7)

2 (13.3)

12 (80.0)

9

The teacher’s interaction with me on-line encouraged me to get the most out of my learning.

4.00

0.160

0 (0.0)

2 (13.3)

13 (86.7)

10

On-line quizzes helped me to learn effectively.

4.15

0.154

3 (20.0)

4 (26.7)

8 (53.3)

11

The workload for the on-line component of this unit of study is too heavy.

2.54

0.268

6 (40.0)

6 (40.0)

3 (20.0)

12

The teacher’s on-line responses motivated me to do more on-line learning than I would have done otherwise.

3.85

0.222

0 (0.0)

6 (40.0)

9 (60.0)

13

Information needed to understand the purpose and contents of the unit was integrated in one place on-line.

3.77

0.281

2 (13.3)

3 (20.0)

10 (66.7)

14

I generally had enough time to understand the things I had to learn on-line.

3.54

0.243

1 (6.7)

6 (40.0)

8 (53.3)

15

I didn’t receive enough helpful on-line feedback from my teacher.

2.15

0.249

8 (53.3)

7 (46.7)

0 (0.0)

16

I interacted with students’ on-line postings/submissions even if they weren’t assessed.

2.77

0.231

4 (26.7)

8 (53.3)

3 (20.0)

17

The on-line activities are designed to get the best out of students.

3.92

0.137

0 (0.0)

3 (20.0)

12 (80.0)

18

Other students’ on-line submissions helped me understand my ideas from a new perspective.

3.77

0.166

0 (0.0)

4 (26.7)

11 (73.3)

19

The guidelines for using on-line discussions were clear to me.

3.92

0.211

0 (0.0)

4 (26.7)

11 (73.3)

20

The on-line teaching materials are designed to really try to make topics interesting to students.

3.92

0.239

1 (6.7)

2 (13.3)

12 (80.0)

21

Other students’ on-line submissions encouraged me to investigate further sources of knowledge.

3.69

0.208

0 (0.0)

6 (40.0)

9 (60.0)

22

The sheer volume of work for the on-line component of this unit of study means it can’t all be thoroughly comprehended.

2.92

0.348

3 (20.0)

7 (46.7)

5 (33.3)

23

The on-line learning materials helped me to learn during the face-to-face situations in this unit of study.

3.62

0.213

1 (6.7)

4 (26.7)

10 (66.7)

24

It was clear if on-line resources were related to assessment.

4.23

0.201

0 (0.0)

2 (13.3)

13 (86.7)

25

The on-line activities helped me to understand the face-to face activities in this unit of study.

3.85

0.191

0 (0.0)

4 (26.7)

11 (73.3)

26

The on-line materials supported some key assessment items in this unit.

4.08

0.178

0 (0.0)

1 (6.7)

14 (93.3)

27

The relationship between the on-line resources and the whole unit of study was clarified on the unit’s website.

3.69

0.237

1 (6.7)

5 (33.3)

9 (60.0)

28

The teacher helped to focus on-line discussions between students.

4.00

0.196

0 (0.0)

3 (20.0)

12 (80.0)

29

Information needed for assignments was integrated in the one place on-line.

3.85

0.222

1 (6.7)

3 (20.0)

11 (73.3)

30

It was clear to me how the website for this unit related to the whole unit of study

3.92

0.239

1 (6.7)

3 (20.0)

11 (73.3)

31

The teacher ensured continuous access to the relevant on-line materials throughout the semester.

4.08

0.239

0 (0.0)

4 (26.7)

11 (73.3)

32

Overall, I was satisfied with the quality of the on-line materials and activities of this unit of study.

4.15

0.274

1 (6.7)

2 (13.3)

12 (80)

  1. items 3, 4, 5, 9, 12, 15 and 28 represent “quality of teaching in e-learning context”
  2. items 7, 16, 18, 21 = “student interaction and engagement”
  3. items 13, 19, 29 = “clarity of goals and standards for online component”
  4. items 8, 17, 20, 23 = “quality of online resources”
  5. items 1, 10 and 26 = “appropriateness of assessment in e-learning context”
  6. items 11, 14 and 22 = “appropriateness of workload related to online materials & activities”
  7. items 2, 6 and 31 = “issues related to student management”
  8. items 24, 25, 27 and 30 = “degree to which online materials and activities support face-to-face learning”
  9. item 32 = “overall satisfaction with the quality of online materials and activities”