Utility and effectiveness of the Scandinavian guidelines to exclude computerized tomography scanning in mild traumatic brain injury - a prospective cohort study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|24 Oct 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Jun 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Olli Tenovuo|
|27 Jun 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eric Thelin|
|24 Jul 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pieter Vos|
|5 Sep 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Arurann Ananthaharan|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Sep 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Sep 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eric Thelin|
|21 Sep 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Olli Tenovuo|
|2 Oct 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pieter Vos|
|16 Oct 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Arurann Ananthaharan|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Oct 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Oct 2018||Editorially accepted|
|20 Nov 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12873-018-0193-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.