Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in emergency medicine based on the PRISMA statement
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|11 Dec 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 Dec 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ardavan Khoshnood|
|10 Jan 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jakub Kenig|
|29 Jan 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Femke Nawijn|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 Jan 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 Jan 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Femke Nawijn|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|31 Jan 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Feb 2019||Editorially accepted|
|11 Feb 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12873-019-0233-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.