Skip to main content

Table 2 The influence of different factors on the overall PRISMA checklist adherence adjusted for type or review

From: Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in emergency medicine based on the PRISMA statement

 

F -value

p - valuea

Total of all review, unadjusted mean ± SD

18 ± 4

NA

NA

Published in journal requiring PRISMA adherence, adjusted mean (SE)

 Yes

19.2 (0.4)

11.0

0.001

 No

17.2 (0.5)

PRISMA use mentioned in review, adjusted mean (SE)

 Yes

18.6 (0.4)

1.6

0.214

 No

17.8 (0.5)

Type of article included in review, adjusted mean (SE)

 Only RCT’s

18.2 (0.8)

0.5

0.486

 Not limited to RCT’s

18.8 (0.3)

Author with affiliation to a epidemiology and/or statistic department, adjusted mean (SE)

 Yes

19.9 (0.9)

3.7

0.057

 No

18.1 (0.3)

  1. NA not applicable, PRISMA preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, RCT randomized controlled trial, SD standard deviation, SE standard error
  2. aANCOVA correcting for type of article (systematic review or meta-analysis)