Skip to main content

Table 3 Multiple logistic regression analysis for in-hospital mortality focusing on the Japan Coma Scale (10-point and four-point scale) and the Glasgow Coma Scale (eye, verbal, and motor response scores and total sum scores) on arrival

From: Association of Japan Coma Scale score on hospital arrival with in-hospital mortality among trauma patients

 

Adjusted ORs

95% CIs

P-value

JCS score, 10-point scale

0

Reference

  

1

1.03

0.69–1.53

0.899

2

1.65

1.32–2.01

< 0.001

3

2.19

1.78–2.70

< 0.001

10

3.90

3.15–4.83

< 0.001

20

3.70

2.99–4.57

< 0.001

30

6.26

5.03–7.79

< 0.001

100

8.00

6.26–10.21

< 0.001

200

11.36

9.22–14.00

< 0.001

300

23.95

19.30–29.71

< 0.001

JCS score, four-point scale

0

Reference

  

one-digit

2.31

2.12–2.52

< 0.001

two-digit

4.81

4.42–5.24

< 0.001

three-digit

27.88

25.74–30.20

< 0.001

Eye response GCS score

E

2.55

2.54–2.56

< 0.001

Verbal response GCS score

V

2.19

2.18–2.19

< 0.001

Motor response GCS score

M

2.01

2.00–2.01

< 0.001

Total sum of GCS score

E + V + M

1.38

1.38–1.38

< 0.001

  1. ORs Odds ratios, CIs Confidence intervals, JCS Japan Coma Scale, GCS Glasgow Coma Scale, TBI Traumatic brain injury, ISS Injury Severity Score
  2. Each adjusted ORs and their 95% CIs were obtained after adjusting for age (16–39 vs. 40–64 vs. ≥65); gender; mechanism of injury (blunt or others); systolic blood pressure of < 90 mmHg vs. ≥90 mmHg; heart rate of < 120 bpm vs. ≥120 bpm; respiratory rate of ≤9 cpm vs. 10–29 cpm vs. ≥30 cpm; presence or absence of severe TBI (head AIS scores of 4 or 5); presence or absence of emergency surgical intervention (craniotomy, thoracotomy, laparotomy, or angioembolization); and ISS of ≤8 vs. 9–15 vs. ≥16. The adjusted ORs of the GCS (eye, verbal, and motor response scores and total sum scores) represent the increase in odds of the outcome with every one unit decrease in the score
Back to article page

BMC Emergency Medicine

ISSN: 1471-227X

Contact us