Skip to main content

Table 3 Five Year comparison of CTAS Scores, January–May 2016–2020

From: The effect of COVID-19 on emergency medical service call volumes and patient acuity: a cross-sectional study in Niagara, Ontario

CTAS Level

Total EMS Calls in 2016 n (%)

Total EMS Calls in 2017 n (%)

Total EMS Calls in 2018 n (%)

Total EMS Calls in 2019 n (%)

Total EMS Calls in 2020 n (%)

Total Calls for Each Level

Proportion of calls in 2020 vs. calls 2016–2019

Relative Change in Calls

Chi Square Test of Independence (Chi-score, p-value)

1 (Resuscitation)

515 (2.4)

605 (2.7)

749 (3.0)

773 (3.1)

894 (3.9)

3536 (3.1)

4.1% vs. 2.9%

−41%

χ2 (1) = 70.36

p < 0.01*

2 (Emergent)

4509 (21.4)

4491 (20.0)

4656 (18.8)

4550 (18.4)

4261 (18.6)

22,467 (19.4)

22.9% vs. 24.3%

6%

χ2 (1) = 10.90

p = 0.01*

3 (Urgent)

10,996 (52.1)

11,137 (49.7)

11,513 (46.5)

11,457 (46.3)

10,060 (43.9)

55,163 (47.6)

78.4% vs. 94.1%

10%

χ2 (1) = 152.61

p < 0.01*

4 (Less Urgent)

1935 (9.2)

2325 (10.4)

2953 (11.9)

2954 (11.9)

2856 (12.5)

13,023 (11.2)

14.3% vs. 12.3%

−17%

χ2 (1) = 43.89

p   < 0.01*

5 (Non-Urgent)

2091 (9.9)

2453 (10.9)

3185 (12.9)

3181 (12.8)

2650(11.6)

13,560 (11.7)

13.1% vs. 13.3%

−1%

χ2 (1) = 0.069

p = 0.79

  1. *Indicates significance. Proportions were calculated using total calls and calls not assigned a CTAS number were not included in the table