Skip to main content

Table 2 Acuity measured as triage priority according to Rapid Emergency Triage and Treatment System (RETTS) by pathway, as reported by the 43 EDs

From: Pathways to the emergency department - a national, cross-sectional study in Sweden

 

Priority/Acuity According to RETTS

Pathway

Red

Orange

Yellow

Green

Blue

Missing

Total

Ambulance service

103 11 71%

283 31%

46%

349 38 22%

126 14 14%

3 0%

2%

56 6 11%

920,100%

Walk-in

21 2 14%

159 12%

26%

509 39 32%

328 25 37%

83 6 20%

210 16 42%

1310 100%

GP with referral

8 2%

6%

58 12%

10%

254 51 16%

120 24 14%

18 4%

4%

39 8%

8%

497,100%

Medical Helpline 1177

6 1%

4%

43 11%

7%

181 44 11%

114 28 13%

15 4%

4%

50 12 10%

409,100%

GP without referral

4 2%

3%

22 9%

4%

117 48 7%

81 33 9%

7 3%

2%

15 6%

3%

246,100%

Other Dr. without referral

2 1%

1%

24 17%

4%

58 40 4%

40 28 5%

5 3%

1%

16 11 3%

145,100%

Other Dr. with referral

1 2%

1%

9 14%

1%

28 44%

2%

12 19 1%

5 8%

1%

8 3%

2%

63,100%

Referred by other

healthcare provider

0 0%

0%

8 12%

1%

28 42 2%

23 34 3%

6 9%

1%

2 3%

0%

67,100%

Scheduled return visit

0 0%

0%

4 3%

1%

48 40%

3%

38 31 4%

18 15 4%

13 11 3%

121,100%

Internet medical service,

with referral

0 0%

0%

0 0%

0%

2100 0%

0 0%

0%

0 0%

0%

0 0%

0%

2100%

Internet medical service,

without referral

0 0%

0%

0 0%

0%

2 22%

0%

5 56%

1%

1 11%

0%

1 11%

0%

9100%

Missing

     

86,100%

17%

86,100%

Total

145

100%

610

100%

1576

100%

887

100%

161

100%

496

100%

3875 100%

100%

  1. Bold numbers indicate actual numbers of registered patients for the respective acuity levels and pathway. Horizontal percentages represent distribution of acuity level per pathway. Vertical percentages represent the distribution of pathway per acuity level. GP General practitioner. Other Dr. = another in-hospital doctor