Table 3 Comparison of modified TEAM score by case type
|  | CPR (n = 110) | TRAUMA (n = 122) | MEDICAL (n = 127) |  |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Item 1: The team leader let the team know what was expected of them through direction and command | 3.0 (2.0–4.0)* | 3.0 (2.0–3.0) | 3.0 (2.0–3.0)* | p = 0.02 |
Item 2: The team leader maintained a global perspective | 3.0 (2.0–3.0) | 3.0 (2.0–3.8) | 3.0 (2.0–3.0) | p = 0.32 |
Item 3: The team communicated effectively | 3.0 (2.0–3.0) | 3.0 (2.0–3.0) | 3.0 (2.0–3.0) | p = 0.70 |
Item 4: The team worked together to complete tasks in a timely manner | 3.0 (3.0–3.0) | 3.0 (2.0–3.0) | 3.0 (2.5–3.0) | p = 0.06 |
Item 5: The team acted with composure and control | 3.0 (2.0–4.0) | 3.0 (2.0–3.0) | 3.0 (3.0–4.0) | p = 0.09 |
Item 6: Team morale was positive | 3.0 (2.0–4.0) | 3.0 (2.0–4.0) | 3.0 (2.0–3.0) | p = 0.62 |
Item 7: The team adapted to changing situations, monitored and reassessed the situation | 3.0 (2.0–4.0) | 3.0 (2.0–3.0) | 3.0 (3.0–3.0) | p = 0.33 |
Item 8: The team anticipated potential actions and prioritised tasks | 3.0 (2.0–3.0) | 3.0 (2.0–3.0) | 3.0 (3.0–3.0) | p = 0.10 |
Total score | 24.0 (19.3–28.0) | 22.5 (17.3–27.0) | 23.0 (20.0–26.0) | p = 0.37 |