PC PAUSE (%) | DISCERN (%) | |
---|---|---|
This survey was easy to use | ||
1 – Strongly disagree | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
2 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
3 | 0 (0.0) | 2 (0.6) |
4 – Neutral | 9 (2.8) | 9 (2.8) |
5 | 33 (10.1) | 24 (7.4) |
6 | 137 (42.0) | 128 (39.4) |
7 – Strongly agree | 147 (45.1) | 162 (49.8) |
The debriefing tool strongly supported the debriefing process | ||
1 – Strongly disagree | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
2 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
3 | 2 (0.6) | 2 (0.6) |
4 – Neutral | 13 (4.0) | 13 (4.0) |
5 | 37 (11.4) | 28 (8.6) |
6 | 140 (42.9) | 129 (39.4) |
7 – Strongly agree | 134 (41.1) | 155 (47.4) |
Comfort making comments/raising questions during debriefing | ||
1 – Strongly disagree | 1 (0.3) | 0 (0.0) |
2 | 0 (0.0) | 2 (0.6) |
3 | 3 (0.9) | 1 (0.3) |
4 – Neutral | 12 (3.7) | 16 (5.0) |
5 | 35 (10.8) | 22 (6.8) |
6 | 79 (24.4) | 98 (30.3) |
7 – Strongly agree | 194 (59.9) | 184 (57.0) |
Number of identified new opportunities to improve | ||
None | 62 (18.9) | 36 (11.7) |
1 | 79 (24.1) | 84 (27.2) |
2 | 105 (32.0) | 94 (30.4) |
3 or more | 82 (25.0) | 95 (30.7) |
Debriefing tool supported emotion support | ||
0 – No | 113 (34.8) | 164 (50.0) |
1 – Yes | 212 (65.2) | 164 (50.0) |
Debriefing tool supported team dynamics | ||
0 – No | 34 (10.5) | 50 (15.2) |
1 – Yes | 291 (89.5) | 278 (84.8) |
Debriefing tool supported quality improvement/patient safety | ||
0 – No | 36 (11.1) | 43 (13.1) |
1 – Yes | 289 (88.9) | 285 (86.9) |
Debriefing tool supported clinical education | ||
0 – No | 126 (38.8) | 142 (43.3) |
1 – Yes | 199 (61.2) | 186 (56.7) |
Debriefing tool supported other | ||
0 – No | 320 (98.5) | 313 (95.4) |
1 – Yes | 5 (1.5) | 15 (4.6) |