Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic information, patient characteristics and analysis of complications

From: Management of oesophageal foreign bodies in children: a 10-year retrospective analysis from a tertiary care center

Patient characteristics

Numbers (%)

Removal methods (RE)a

Complicationsa

χ2

P

Yes (n = 130)

No. (n = 428)

Gender

 Male

759 (56.0%)

308

71

237

0.023

0.879

 Female

596 (44.0%)

250

59

191

Age

 0–3 y

762 (56.2%)

274

84

190

16.376

0.000

 3–6 y

369 (27.2%)

135

21

114

  ≥ 6y

224 (16.5%)

149

25

124

Duration

 <24 h

1036 (76.5%)

403

73

330

21.813

0.000

  ≥ 24 h

319 (23.5%)

155

57

98

Location

 Upper oesophagus

1120 (82.6%)

399

109

290

12.719

0.002

 Middle oesophagus

167 (12.3%)

125

17

108

 Lower oesophagus

68 (5.0%)

34

4

30

Type

 Blunt object

812 (59.9%)

15

1

14

339.288

0.000

 Sharp object

278 (20.5%)

278

35

243

 Button battery

86 (6.3%)

86

86

0

 Food impaction

84 (6.2%)

84

3

81

 Toy

51 (3.8%)

51

4

47

 Plastic

44 (3.2%)

44

1

43

Symptoms

 Drooling

751 (55.4%)

288

76

212

46.649

0.000

 Dysphagia

549 (40.5%)

211

55

156

 Pain

487 (35.9%)

206

43

163

 Vomiting

426 (31.4%)

179

36

143

 Crying

616 (45.5%)

233

39

194

 Cough

101 (7.5%)

32

14

18

 Fever

56 (4.1%)

47

19

28

 Haematemesis

19 (1.4%)

7

7

0

  1. Upper oesophagus: above the level of T2; middle oesophagus: the level of T3-T6; lower oesophagus: below the level of T7
  2. RE Rigid endoscopy
  3. aOnly EFB patients who underwent rigid oesophageal endoscopy were analysed