Skip to main content

Table 2 Prevalence and effect of characteristics that made the index incident troubling

From: The critical incident inventory: characteristics of incidents which affect emergency medical technicians and paramedics

 

Prevalence*

Effect size†

N

%

eta2

sig.

Situational characteristics

    

Factors beyond my control.

140

62.8

.09

<.001

It showed how people can be cruel or neglectful

97

43.5

.02

.02

Dealing with the relatives was difficult.

88

39.5

.06

<.001

End of shift.

35

15.7

.02

.045

The situation was dangerous for me or another paramedic.

27

12.1

.09

<.001

I spent time with the patient and I got to know him – her

19

8.5

.02

.06

Any situation characteristic

197

88.3

.09

<.001

Systemic characteristics

    

It was mismanaged at the time.

48

21.5

0.06

<.001

How the call was relayed - treated.

40

17.9

0.05

.001

The supervisor’s reaction.

36

16.1

0.04

.002

It was mismanaged after the incident.

36

16.1

0.02

.04

How the call was handled by dispatch.

27

12.1

0.05

.001

There was an investigation or complaint about it

27

12.1

0.03

.01

Reactions of peers.

26

11.7

0.03

.01

Inadequate equipment.

12

5.4

0.02

.06

Any system characteristic

101

45.3

0.08

<.001

Personal characteristics

    

I was surprised by the call.

116

52.0

0.08

<.001

I felt helpless.

108

48.4

0.17

<.001

I felt overwhelmed.

76

34.1

0.22

<.001

I felt I didn’t do a good enough job.

47

21.1

0.07

<.001

Fatigue.

44

19.7

0.04

.004

There were cumulative work stressors in my life at the time.

33

14.8

0.07

<.001

I felt unappreciated.

24

10.8

0.05

.001

There were stresses in my personal life at the time.

23

10.3

0.07

<.001

Any self characteristic

179

80.3

0.17

<.001

  1. The following items were removed because they had an effect size < 0.015: the outcome was bad (79%), a child was involved (54%), it was gruesome (44%), it was violent (38%), there were multiple casualties (22%), the patient reminded me of someone close to me (17%), lack of allied services, back-up, personnel, equipment, etc. (14%), the response of doctors and nurses on arrival at hospital (10%), over-involvement or under-involvement of allied services (10%), I don’t remember, it just was (10%), access issues (9%), the media exposure was a problem (7%), the patient was someone I knew (4%), equipment failure (2%).
  2. † Difference in peritraumatic distress between EMT/paramedics who did or did not endorse this item.