Skip to main content

Table 3 Type of equipment used and speciality of physicians for aspiration and thoracic drainage

From: How spontaneous pneumothorax is managed in emergency departments: a French multicentre descriptive study

Type of treatment

Category

 

All SP*

PSP*

SSP

p

   

n = 1868

n = 1510

n = 358

 

Thoracic drainage (n = 670)

 

Equipment

    

0.07

  

Chest tube, n (%)

568 (91%)

462 (92%)

106 (86.9%)

 
  

Pleurocath, n (%)

52 (8.3%)

38 (7.6%)

14 (11.5%)

 
  

Pigtail catheter, n (%)

1 (0.2%)

0

1 (0.8%)

 
  

Other, n (%)

3 (0.5%)

2 (0.4%)

1 (0.8%)

 
 

Speciality of physicians

    

0.3

  

Emergency physician, n (%)

363 (68.8%)

285 (68.7%)

78 (69%)

 
  

Respiratory medicine, n (%)

56 (10.6%)

40 (9.6%)

16 (14.2%)

 
  

Surgeon, n (%)

46 (8.7%)

36 (8.7%)

10 (8.8%)

 
  

Intensive care physician, n (%)

63 (11.9%)

54 (13%)

9 (8%)

 

Aspiration (n = 189)

 

Equipment

    

0.58

  

Needle thoracocentesis, n (%)

58 (80.6%)

50 (80.6%)

8 (80%)

 
  

Catheters, n (%)

7 (9.7%)

6 (9.7%)

1 (20%)

 
  

Other, n (%)

4 (5.6%)

4 (6.5%)

0

 
  

Pleurocath, n (%)

3 (4.2%)

2 (3.2%)

0

 
 

Speciality of physicians

    

0.12

  

Emergency physician, n (%)

115 (79.9%)

94 (81%)

21 (75%)

 
  

Respiratory medicine, n (%)

17 (11.8%)

11 (9.5%)

6 (21.4%)

 
  

Surgeon, n (%)

9 (6.3%)

9 (7.8%)

0

 
  

Intensive care physician, n (%)

3 (2.1%)

2 (1.7%)

0

 
  1. SP spontaneous pneumothorax
  2. PSP primary spontaneous pneumothorax
  3. SSP secondary spontaneous pneumothorax
  4. *122 patients excluded from analysis because randomised in the EXPRED study