Skip to main content

Table 3 Variables from R1 attaining ‘high agreement’ in R2

From: Developing outcome, process and balancing measures for an emergency department longitudinal patient monitoring system using a modified Delphi

Variable domain

Round One

Round Two

p-value

No of respondents

Variable

No (%) panellists ranking variable Important/ Very important

No of respondents

Variable

No (%) panellists ranking variable Important/ Very important

Treatment

39

Time of completion of admitting/consulting team assessment to time of ED departure

26 (66.7%)

35

Time of completion of admitting/consulting team assessment in the ED to time of ED departure

25 (71.4%)

0.66

Treatment

39

ICU admission rate

22 (56.4%)

35

ICU admission rate

30 (85.7%)

0.01

Implementation

35

ICU referral rate

23 (65.7%)

32

ICU referral rate

25 (78.1%)

0.78

Implementation

35

Resuscitation room activity level

22 (62.9%)

32

Resuscitation room activity level

30 (93.8%)

0.01

Implementation

35

Number of times ISBAR communication tool was used to communicate the need for escalation

22 (62.9%)

32

Number of times ISBAR communication tool was used to communicate the need for escalation

25 (78.1%)

0.52

Implementation

35

Health Professionals Work Index (HPWI) survey to measure autonomy and control over practice; work place relationships; managerial support and availability of resources

20 (57.1%)

32

Staff perception of availability of support and resources

27 (84.4%)

0.04

Implementation

35

Number of people being triaged

18 (51.4%)

32

Number of patients triaged

27 (84.4%)

0.01

Implementation

35

Minnesota Job Satisfaction Questionnaire to measure job satisfaction

16 (45.7%)

32

Job satisfaction for ED staff

30 (93.8%)

< 0.001

Treatment (Round 1) /utcome (Round 2)

39

Admission to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) within 2 days of having been assessed and treated and deemed appropriate for admission to a hospital ward from ED

25 (64.1%)

31

Admission to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) within 2 h of having been assessed and treated and deemed appropriate for admission to the ICU from the ED

22 (71.0%)

0.55

Outcome

34

In-hospital mortality rate

23 (67.6%)

31

In-hospital mortality rate

24 (77.4%)

0.38

Balancing

32

Service delivery measured through e.g. resources (beds, equipment etc.) against recommended requirements

22 (68.8%)

30

Service delivery measured through e.g. available resources (beds, equipment etc.) against recommended requirements

23 (76.7%)

0.72

Balancing

32

Average length of stay (AVLOS) in hospital for patients who come through ED

22 (68.8%)

30

Average length of stay (AVLOS) in hospital for patients who come through ED

23 (76.7%)

0.72

Balancing

32

Number of patients waiting for in-patient beds

21 (65.6%)

30

Number of patients who are in the ED waiting for in-patient beds

24 (80.0%)

0.30