Skip to main content

Table 2 Descriptions of Biomarker Technologies and Outcomes

From: A scoping review of pre-hospital technology to assist ambulance personnel with patient diagnosis or stratification during the emergency assessment of suspected stroke

Study Details

Portability

Expertise and training requirements

Person interpreting output

Location (on scene; stationary ambulance; in transit)

Purpose, diagnostic accuracy, comparator and use of clinical scale

Physical invasiveness and time to acquire results

Acceptability: clinicians and/or patients

Impact on EMS clinician decisions or treatment provision

Impact on process (time metrics) or patient outcomes

Costs

Helsinki Ultra-acute Stroke Biomarker Study

Lindsberg 2018 [22]

Sub-type:

Proteins

Portable with use of a vehicle

Expertise:

EMS clinician

Training: not reported

EMS clinician

In transit

Purpose: Diagnostic

-Mimic

-TIA

-Ischaemia

-Haemorrhage

Diagnostic accuracy:

Results not yet available

Comparator:

Definitive diagnosis

Clinical Scale: none

Invasive

Time to acquire results: not yet available

Not assessed

Destination:

Results not yet available

Treatment:

Results not yet available

Time metrics:

Not yet available

Patient outcomes:

will be evaluated using 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS)

Not reported

Purines for Rapid Identification of Stroke Mimics (PRISM)

Shaw et al. 2019 [23]

Sub-type: Purines (Metabolite)

Highly portable (hand-held)

Expertise:

EMS clinician

Training:

Required

EMS clinician

On scene

Stationary

In transit

Purpose: Diagnostic

-Mimic

-TIA

-Ischaemia

-Haemorrhage

Diagnostic accuracy:

Results not yet available

Comparator:

Expert clinical opinion informed by brain imaging and/or other investigations

Clinical scale: FAST

Invasive

Time to acquire results: ~ 3–5 min

Results not yet available

Destination:

Results not yet available

Treatment:

Results not yet available

Not yet available

Not reported