Skip to main content

Table 2 Background characteristics

From: Adherence to the ABCDE approach in relation to the method of instruction: a randomized controlled simulation study

Characteristic

CL a

VBI

p value b

Number of participants, n (%)

44

 

28

 

0.358 c

Nurses

36

(81.8)

24

(85.7)

 

Pediatric residents/NP/PA

5

(11.4)

4

(14.3)

 

Neonatal fellows/neonatologists

3

(6.8)

0

(0.0)

 

Age, median years (IQR)

44

(30.0–56.8)

42

(37.5–52.8)

0.871 d

Sex, n of women (%)

40

(90.9)

26

(92.9)

1.000

Previous participation in NALS training, n (%)

    

0.608

< 4 times

16

(36.4)

8

(28.6)

 

≥4 times

27

(61.4)

20

(71.4)

 

Participation in relevant courses, n (%) e

    

0.332

Yes

21

(47.7)

10

(35.7)

 

No

22

(50.0)

18

(64.3)

 

Experienced real-life neonatal resuscitation, n (%)

    

0.778

≤5 times

30

(68.2)

21

(75.0)

 

> 5 times

13

(29.5)

7

(25.0)

 

Working experience in pediatrics, n (%)

    

0.585

≤5 years

13

(29.5)

6

(21.4)

 

> 5 years

31

(70.5)

22

(78.6)

 

Working experience at neonatal IC or HC, n (%)

    

1.000

≤2 years

10

(22.7)

6

(21.4)

 

> 2 years

34

(77.3)

22

(78.6)

 

Working experience at pediatric IC or HC, n (%)

    

0.572

≤2 years

34

(77.3)

20

(71.4)

 

> 2 years

9

(20.5)

8

(28.6)

 
  1. CL conventional lecture, EPLS European Paediatric Life Support, HC high care, IC intensive care, IQR interquartile range, NALS neonatal advanced life support, NLS neonatal life support, NP nurse practitioner, PA physician assistant, PALS pediatric advanced life support, VBI video-based instruction
  2. aSome background information of one participant in this group could not be retrieved
  3. bGroup differences were tested with the Fisher’s exact test, unless stated otherwise
  4. cGroup difference regarding profession category was tested with the Chi-Square test
  5. dGroup difference regarding age was tested with the Mann-Whitney U test
  6. ee.g. NLS/NALS, PALS, EPLS