Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of patient outcomes at different phases of the study. P1: P value for the pre-intervention vs Interim-intervention comparison. P2: P value for the pre-intervention vs post-intervention comparison. P3: P value for the interim-intervention vs post-intervention comparison

From: Shortening door-to-puncture time and improving patient outcome with workflow optimization in patients with acute ischemic stroke associated with large vessel occlusion

 

Pre-intervention, n = 14

Interim-intervention, n = 39

Post-intervention, n = 45

P

P1

P2

P3

Pneumonia, n, %

6 (42.9%)

16 (41.0%)

15 (33.3%)

0.702

0.905

0.516

0.466

TICI post ≥ 2b, n, %

11 (78.6%)

34 (87.2%)

37 (82.2%)

0.709

0.440

0.759

0.531

Urinary tract infection, n, %

1 (9.1%)

0 (0.0%)

4 (8.9%)

0.169

0.092

0.838

0.056

sICH, n, %,

5 (35.7%)

6 (15.4%)

4 (8.9%)

0.052

0.108

0.015

0.359

mRS discharge (IQR)

4.0 (4.0,5.0)

4.0 (2.0,5.0)

3.0 (1.0,5.0)

0.515

0.976

0.516

0.486

Inpatient Mortality/hospice discharge, n, %

3 (21.4%)

9 (23.1%)

10 (22.2%)

0.991

0.899

0.095

0.926

The favorable outcome at 3 months, n, %

3 (21.4%)

16 (41.0%)

25 (55.6%)

0.067

0.190

0.026

0.184

Mortality at 3 months, n, %

7 (50.0%)

15 (38.5%)

13 (28.9%)

0.319

0.452

0.145

0.353