Skip to main content

Table 5 Frequency of using management strategies in heat-emergencies among patients with at least one potential heat emergency symptom and patients with a confirmed diagnosis

From: Improvement in the diagnosis and practices of emergency healthcare providers for heat emergencies after HEAT (heat emergency awareness & treatment) an educational intervention: a multicenter quasi-experimental study

Management

Patients with potential heat-emergencies

Patients diagnosed by ED physicians

Pre-intervention (2017) (n = 4181)

Post-intervention (2018) (n = 4022)

P-Value

Pre-intervention (2017) (n = 125)

Post-intervention (2018) (n = 302)

P-Value

At least one complete vital signsa

784 (18.75%)

977 (24.29%)

 < 0.001*

12 (9.6%)

207 (68.5%)

 < 0.001*

Temperature monitoring

41 (0.9%)

496 (12.9%)

 < 0.001*

0 (0%)

149 (49.3%)

 < 0.001*

External cooling measures

 Water sponging

89 (1.3%)

210 (3.4%)

 < 0.001*

8 (6.4%)

79 (26.2%)

 < 0.001*

 Use pedestal fan

2922 (43.1%)

3094 (50.6%)

 < 0.001*

21 (16.8%)

29 (9.6%)

0.035*

 Removal of extra body clothing

2 (0%)

3 (0.1%)

0.624

0 (0%)

1 (0.3%)

0.52

 Ice packs at groins, neck, and axilla

6 (0.1%)

9 (0.2%)

0.395

0 (0%)

4 (1.3%)

0.196

Treatment

 Administration of IV fluids

1885 (42.1%)

1804 (46.8%)

0.833

85 (68%)

223 (73.8%)

0.221

  1. aIncluded all four components of vital signs (BP, pulse rate, respiratory rate & body temperature)
  2. *Significant