Skip to main content

Table 2 Outcomes of administering ketamine or etomidate before and after propensity matching

From: Ketamine versus etomidate for rapid sequence intubation in patients with trauma: a retrospective study in a level 1 trauma center in Korea

 

Unmatched patients

1:3 propensity score matching patients

Outcomes

Ketamine

(n = 118)

Etomidate (n = 502)

95% CI

Ketamine

(n = 118)

Etomidate (n = 354)

95% CI

First-pass success rate, n (%)

107 (90.7)

448 (89.2)

(-0.13, 0.08)

107 (90.7)

319 (90.1)

(-0.15, 0.13)

Mortality, n (%)

19 (16.1)

98 (19.5)

(-0.05, 0.12)

19 (16.1)

73 (20.6)

(-0.05, 0.15)

ICU LOS, days, median (IQR)

8 (4–15)

8 (3–19)

(-5.13, 6.79)

8 (4–15)

10 (4–21)

(-6.01, 6.03)

Ventilator days, median (IQR)

4 (2–10)

4 (2–13)

(-3.5, 3.34)

4 (2–10)

5 (2–13)

(-4.1, 2.9)

Hospital LOS, days, median (IQR)

24.5 (10.25–38.5)

19 (7–38)

(-2.41, 12.23)

24.5 (10.25–38.5)

22 (8–40)

(-3.69, 11.15)

  1. CI, Confidence Interval; ICU, intensive care unit; LOS, length of stay; IQR, Interquartile range