Tranexamic acid for patients with traumatic brain injury: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
© Yutthakasemsunt et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 8 February 2013
Accepted: 13 November 2013
Published: 22 November 2013
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is commonly accompanied by intracranial bleeding which can worsen after hospital admission. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been shown to reduce bleeding in elective surgery and there is evidence that short courses of TXA can reduce rebleeding in spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage. We aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of TXA in preventing progressive intracranial haemorrhage in TBI.
This is a double blinded, placebo controlled randomized trial. We enrolled 238 patients older than 16 years with moderate to severe TBI (post-resuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 4 to 12) who had a computerized tomography (CT) brain scan within eight hours of injury and in whom there was no immediate indication for surgery. We excluded patients if they had a coagulopathy or a serum creatinine over than 2.0 milligrams%. The treatment was a single dose of 2 grams of TXA in addition to other standard treatments. The primary outcome was progressive intracranial haemorrhage (PIH) which was defined as an intracranial haemorrhage seen on the second CT scan that was not seen on the first CT scan, or an intracranial haemorrhage seen on the first scan that had expanded by 25% or more on any dimension (height, length, or width) on the second scan.
Progressive intracranial haemorrhage was present in 21 (18%) of 120 patients allocated to TXA and in 32 (27%) of 118 patients allocated to placebo. The difference was not statistically significant [RR = 0.65 (95% CI 0.40 to 1.05)]. There were no significant difference in the risk of death from all causes in patients allocated to TXA compared with placebo [RR = 0.69 (95% CI 0.35 to 1.39)] and the risk of unfavourable outcome on the Glasgow Outcome Scale [RR = 0.76 (95% CI 0.46 to 1.27)]. There was no evidence of increased risk of thromboembolic events in those patients allocated to TXA.
TXA may reduce PIH in patients with TBI; however, the difference was not statistically significant in this trial. Large clinical trials are needed to confirm and to assess the effect of TXA on death or disability after TBI.
KeywordsTraumatic brain injury Adults Moderately severe TBI Intracranial haemorrhage Progressive haemorrhage Delayed haemorrhage Expanding haemorrhage Antifibrinolytic agent Tranexamic acid Randomized controlled trial Human Placebo
Each year, world-wide more than 1.5 million people die and about 10 million people are hospitalized following traumatic brain injury (TBI) . Many survivors experienced long term disability . In Thailand, each year around 8,000 people died following acute TBI and tens of thousands were hospitalized. A follow up study of 418 patients who were admitted to Khon Kaen regional hospital following TBI found that 29% of patients were either dead or severely disabled six months following the injury .
TBI is commonly accompanied by intracranial bleeding which occurs in 25% to 45%, 3% to 12% and 0.2% of severe, moderate and mild TBI cases respectively . There were evidences indicating that this bleeding can develop or continue after hospital admission and that larger bleeds have a worse prognosis –. Delayed enlargement of traumatic intraparenchymal contusions and hematomas is the most common cause of clinical deterioration and death in patients who had a lucid interval after TBI [8, 13].
A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCT) shows that antifibrinolytic agents are effective in reducing bleeding in elective surgery. The review summarized data from 211 RCTs involving 20,781 participants showed that both Aprotinin and Tranexamic acid (TXA) reduced the need for blood transfusion in elective surgery by about one third [RR = 0.61 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.69)] with no evidences of increased adverse effects . If antifibrinolytics reduced intracranial bleeding in patients with TBI, this would have important clinical implications. However, a systematic review of haemostatic drugs in patients with TBI found no RCTs .
There were some evidences on the use of TXA in patients with spontaneous aneurysmal intracranial bleeding. A systematic review of RCTs of TXA in aneurysmal haemorrhage found that although rebleeding was reduced by 45% [odds ratio = 0.55 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.71)], this benefit was offset by cerebral ischaemia such that there was no overall patients benefit . However, these trials used high doses TXA for about six weeks and it has been suggested that a shorter and lower dose might prevent rebleeding whilst avoiding the risk of ischaemia. Indeed, since the review was published a trial of early short course (3 days) TXA showed that it reduced rebleeding from 10.8% to 2.4% without ischaemic adverse effects .
We conducted a double blind randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effect of early short course TXA on the occurrence of progressive intracranial haemorrhage (PIH) in patients with TBI treated at a large regional trauma centre in rural Thailand.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial was conducted. The trial protocol was approved by the Khon Kaen hospital’s ethics committee and the Khon Kaen University’s ethics committee. The trial protocol was registered with http://www.clinicaltrials.gov with the trial identifier NCT00755209. All written informed consent forms were obtained from legally acceptable representative of comatose participants.
All patients, older than 16 years, with moderate to severe TBI (post-resuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 4 to 12) who had a computerized tomography (CT) brain scan performed within eight hours of injury, and whom there was no immediate indication for surgery, were eligible for inclusion. There were both of isolated TBI and polytrauma patients whom there were critical concern for TBI management during the admission period. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant, had evidences of coagulopathy, known to be receiving a medication which affects haemostasis, or had a serum creatinine over than 2 mg/decilitre. Coagulopathy was considered present if any of the following hematological parameters were observed: (1) platelet count less than 100,000 cells/mm3; (2) Prothrombin time (PT) or international normalized ratio (INR) prolonged more than 1.5 times normal value; (3) activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) more than 10 seconds greater than normal value. Coagulopathy was a risk factor for developing PIH and mortality in previous studies [10, 11, 18]– or recent reports [23, 24]. Hence it was confounding factor to be controlled by exclusion.
Patients were randomly allocated to receive TXA (loading dose of 1.0 gram over 30 minutes followed by a maintenance dose of 1.0 gram infused over eight hours) or matching placebo. The placebo was sterile water and was purchased on the open market in Thailand.
The primary outcome was progressive intracranial haemorrhage. It would have more association to therapeutic effect of given tranexamic acid than other outcomes in this study . Moreover it was a significant source or link to morbidity and mortality in TBI [8, 10, 18]–[20, 26]. PIH was defined as an intracranial haemorrhage seen on the second CT scan that was not seen on the first CT scan, or an intracranial haemorrhage seen on the first scan that had expanded by 25% or more on any dimension (height, length, or width) on the second scan. Progressive pressure effect was defined as either an increase in midline shift of greater than 1 mm or an increase in basal cistern between the first and second CT scan. The second CT scan was to be taken 24 hours ± 8 hours after the first CT scan. Improved Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) motor score was also recorded to see if there is compatible change between clinical and radiological progression at 24 hours.
The presence or absence of PIH was assessed by two independent readers. Both were neurosurgeons at KKH with experiences in reading posttraumatic CT scans. When there was disagreement about the presence or absence of PIH this was resolved by a third neurosurgeon reader. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by kappa statistic.
Secondary outcomes were death, functional status assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at hospital discharge, blood transfusion, neurosurgical operation and any in-hospital thromboembolic events (myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and stroke).
We planned to randomize approximately 240 patients, 120 to each group. We estimated that the proportion of patients with PIH would be 30% in the placebo group and that TXA would reduce to be 15%. A trial with 240 patients would have about 80% power at the 0.05 level of significance (two-sided test) to detect a treatment effect of this magnitude.
Randomisation and blinding
The randomisation sequence (with a randomly varied block size) was generated from a computer by a person who was not involved with the trial and this sequence was used to prepare the sequentially numbered treatment packs. Whenever an eligible patient was recruited, the recruiting clinician asked that the next sequentially numbered sealed opaque treatment pack be opened and that the trial loading dose and maintenance infusion be prepared and sent to the relevant ward. This preparation was done out of sight of the recruiting clinician and research participants by nurses who were not involved in the trial. Each treatment pack contained unlabelled vials of either drug or placebo. Although drug and placebo vials contained an identical amount of colorless solution, there was a small size discrepancy between the drug and placebo vials. It was for this reason that the vials were enclosed within sequentially numbered sealed opaque envelopes that were opened by nurses who were not involved in the trial. This approach ensured good allocation concealment and also ensured that those caring for the patient and those conducting the trial did not know the assigned treatment. The allocation scheme was kept confidential from all research participants until the end of the study.
The primary analysis was on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis with complete case analysis for other outcomes and was done using STATA software version 10.0. The presence or absence of PIH was analyzed as a dichotomous variable. The Glasgow Outcome Scale was also dichotomized such that death, persistent vegetative state, and severe disability constituted an unfavorable outcome while favorable outcome included moderate disability and good recovery. We calculated relative risks, risk difference with their 95% confidence intervals and hypothesis testing between the two treatment groups.
TXA (n =120)
Placebo (n = 118)
Age at randomization (years)
Glasgow coma scale (GCS) severity: Moderate (9 – 12) Severe (4 – 8)
Baseline haematocrit (volume %)
Time since injury (hours)
Isolated TBI injury
Polytrauma with TBI injury
Mean injury severity score (range)
Midline shift (>3 mm) on first CT (mm)
Basal cistern compression on first CT
(n = 120)
(n = 118)
Progressive intracranial haemorrhage (PIH)
moderate TBI (n = 24)
severe TBI (n = 20)
Increase in pressure effect*
[(−0.09) – 0.07]
Improved GCS motor score at 24 hours
[(−0.12) – 0.11]
[(−0.00) – 0.05]
Blood products transfusion
[(−0.13) – 0.09]
[(−0.13) – 0.04]
Unfavorable (GOS) outcome
[(−0.16) – 0.05]
Deep vein thrombosis
Effect of various methods of handling missing response in trial
Methods of analysis
PIH in TXA and placebo group
1. Complete case analysis
2. Assuming poor outcome
3. Assuming good outcome
4. Extreme case favoring placebo
5. Extreme case favoring TXA
We found a statistically insignificant difference but with a trend towards significant reduction in the risk of PIH in patients allocated to TXA without evidence of increased risk of thrombotic adverse events. The risks of death and of unfavorable outcome on the Glasgow Outcome Score were lower for patients allocated to TXA. The safety of early short course treatment of TXA in our TBI patients was compatible to no increasing risk of non-fatal vascular occlusive events with early short course treatment of TXA in traumatic bleeding patients in CRASH2 trial .
Strengths and weaknesses
This is the leading randomized trial to examine the effectiveness of the early administration of a short course of TXA in patients with acute TBI. We are aware of a recent study publication of CRASH2 trial and we anticipate that the results of all relevant trials will ultimately be combined in the Cochrane systematic review of haemostatic drugs for TBI . Our trial was properly randomized with good allocation concealment. The timing of the second CT scan was pre-specified in the protocol and all outcome measurements were made without knowledge of treatment allocation. The main weakness of our study is the low power to estimate the effect of TXA on clinical outcomes. In particular, although our study has shown statistically insignificant difference that TXA may reduce PIH, because of the low powers to examine the effect of TXA on death and on disability, the clinical implications of our findings are still limited.
Another limitation is lacking to explore an effect of associated injury or injury severity score in multiple trauma patients which was concerned in some studies [19, 21]. We precluded exploring this association to the treatment by our limited sample size. Polytrauma subjects were almost patients whom there was agreement from trauma care team to concern treatment for TBI as same as isolated TBI subjects at first moment. Therefore we assigned serious, critical and serious injury degree for moderate TBI, severe TBI and other anatomical organ injuries in the category of injury severity score assessment respectively. The common associated injuries were extremity fracture, facial fracture, rib or clavicular fracture and a few cases of other chest injury or minor abdominal trauma.
Finally the exclusion of coagulopathy is also a limitation of our study and this subject could be a point to explore in further research.
PIH in TBI
Various terms have been used to describe the development or enlargement of intracranial bleeding after TBI. Terms include delayed traumatic intracranial haemorrhage (DTICH) , expanding hematoma  and progressive hemorrhagic injury . In this paper we combined these concepts such that we included both new haemorrhage and expanding haemorrhage (progressive intracranial haemorrhage). Our rationale was that both lesions may exacerbate intracranial hypertension and the occurrence of both may be affected by the administration of TXA.
Although patients were excluded if they had evidence of coagulopathy at baseline the proportion of patients with PIH among the patients was surprisingly high. Had we not excluded coagulopathic patients it is likely that the proportion of patients with PIH would have been even higher. Previous estimates of the occurrence of PIH vary widely from 7% to 60% . These differences are likely to reflect difference in timing of the CT scan, clinical setting and diagnostic criteria. Nevertheless, given the relatively high prevalence of PIH in patients with TBI observed in this study the potential for TXA to improve clinical outcomes could be high.
Methods of handling missing response in trial
We summarize the result of handling missing outcome for the primary outcome in Table 3.
We have not shown that TXA improves clinical outcomes and this information would be required in order to make any recommendation about the use of TXA in clinical practice. Our results have important implications for research. If an early short course of TXA could be demonstrated to improve clinical outcomes after TBI without any important adverse effects, then this treatment, because it is cheap and widely practicable, could contribute importantly to reducing mortality and disability after TBI.
We thank Khon Kaen hospital (KKH), the Thailand research fund, the Faculty of medicine, Khon Kaen University (KKU), Thailand. We thank Ian Roberts from London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) for advice on the protocol and the manuscript. We also thank the patients and relatives involved in the trial and the staffs who cared for them.
- Bruns J, Hauser WA: The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury: a review. Epilepsia. 2003, 44 (Suppl 10): 2-10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fleminger S, Ponsford J: Long term outcome after traumatic brain injury. BMJ. 2005, 331: 1419-1420. 10.1136/bmj.331.7530.1419.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Yutthakasemsunt S: Study in traumatic brain injury outcome study in Khon Kaen hospital: analysis of clinical factors and outcomes [In Thai]. J Trauma. 2006, 25/2: 53-75.Google Scholar
- Bullock MR, Chesnut R, Ghajar J, Gordon D, Hartl R, Newell DW, Servadei F, Walters BC, Wilberger JE: Introduction. Neurosurger. 2006, 58 (3 Suppl): S1-S3. discussion Si-ivGoogle Scholar
- Merino-deVillasante J, Taveras JM: Computerized tomography (CT) in acute head trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1976, 126: 765-778. 10.2214/ajr.126.4.765.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brown FD, Mullan S, Duda EE: Delayed traumatic intracerebral hematomas. Report of three cases. J Neurosurg. 1978, 48: 1019-1022. 10.3171/jns.19126.96.36.1999.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Diaz FG, Yock DH, Larson D, Rockswold GL: Early diagnosis of delayed posttraumatic intracerebral hematomas. J Neurosurg. 1979, 50: 217-223. 10.3171/jns.1979.50.2.0217.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gudeman SK, Kishore PR, Miller JD, Girevendulis AK, Lipper MH, Becker DP: The genesis and significance of delayed traumatic intracerebral hematoma. Neurosurgery. 1979, 5: 309-313. 10.1227/00006123-197909000-00002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamaki T, Hirakawa K, Ueguchi T, Tenjin H, Kuboyama T, Nakagawa Y: Chronological evaluation of acute traumatic intracerebral haematoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1990, 103: 112-115. 10.1007/BF01407516.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oertel M, Kelly DF, McArthur D, Boscardin WJ, Glenn TC, Lee JH, Gravori T, Obukhov D, McBride DQ, Martin NA: Progressive haemorrhage after head trauma: predictors and consequences of the evolving injury. J Neurosurg. 2002, 96 (1): 109-116. 10.3171/jns.2002.96.1.0109.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chang EF, Meeker M, Holland MC: Acute traumatic intraparenchymal haemorrhage: risk factors for progression in the early post-injury period. Neurosurgery. 2006, 58: 647-656. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000197101.68538.E6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perel P, Roberts I, Bouamra O, Woodford M, Mooney J, Lecky F: Intracranial bleeding in patients with traumatic brain injury: a prognostic study. BMC Emerg Med. 2009, 9: 15-10.1186/1471-227X-9-15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rockswold GL, Leonard PR, Nagib MG: Analysis of management in thirty-three closed head injury patients who “talked and deteriorated”. Neurosurgery. 1987, 21 (1): 51-55. 10.1227/00006123-198707000-00010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Henry DA, Carless PA, Moxey AJ, O’Connell D, Stoke BJ, McClelland B, Laupacis A, Fergusson D: Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007, CD001886-4Google Scholar
- Perel P, Roberts I, Shakur H, Thinkhamrop B, Phuenpathom N, Yutthakasemsunt S: Haemostatic drugs for traumatic brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010, CD007877-1Google Scholar
- Roos YB, Rinkel GJ, Vermeulen M, Algra A, van Gijn J: Antifibrinolytic therapy for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003, CD001245-2Google Scholar
- Hillman J, Fridriksson S, Nilsson O, Yu Z, Saveland H, Jakobsson KE: Immediate administration of tranexamic acid and reduced incidence of early rebleeding after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a prospective randomized study. J Neurosurg. 2002, 97 (4): 771-778. 10.3171/jns.2002.97.4.0771.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stein SC, Young GS, Talucci RC, Greenbaum BH, Ross SE: Delayed brain injury after head trauma: significance of coagulopathy. Neurosurgery. 1992, 30: 160-165. 10.1227/00006123-199202000-00002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sanus GZ, Tanriverdi T, Alver I, Aydin S, Uzan M: Evolving traumatic brain lesions: predictors and results of ninety-eight head-injured patients. Neurosurg Q. 2004, 14: 97-104. 10.1097/01.wnq.0000127718.06183.12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yadav YR, Basoor A, Jain G, Nelson A: Expanding traumatic intracerebral contusion/hematoma. Neurol India. 2006, 54: 377-381. 10.4103/0028-3886.28109.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brohi K, Cohen MJ, Davenport RA: Acute coagulopathy of trauma:mechanism, identification and effect. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007, 13: 680-685. 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282f1e78f.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harhangi BS, Kompanje EJ, Leebeek FW, Maas AI: Coagulation disorders after traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008, 150: 165-175. 10.1007/s00701-007-1475-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Talving P, Benfield R, Hadjizacharia P, Inaba K, Chan LS, Demetriades D: Coagulopathy in severe traumatic brain injury: a prospective study. J Trauma. 2009, 66: 55-56. 10.1097/TA.0b013e318190c3c0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- White CL, Griffith S, Caron JL: Early progression of traumatic cerebral contusions: characterization and risk factors. J Trauma. 2009, 67: 508-514. 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b2519f.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dunn CJ, Goa KL: Tranexamic acid: a review of its use in surgery and other indications. Drugs. 1999, 57 (6): 1005-1032. 10.2165/00003495-199957060-00017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cohen TI, Gudeman SK: Delayed traumatic intracranial hematoma. Neurotrauma. Edited by: Narayan RK, WJ Povlishock JT. 1996, New York: McGraw-Hill, 689-701.Google Scholar
- Shakur H, Roberts I, Bautista R, Caballero J, Coats T, Dewan Y, El-Sayed H, Gogichaishvili T, Gupta S, Herrera J, Hunt B, Iribhogbe P, Izurieta M, Khamis H, Komolafe E, Marrero MA, Mejía-Mantilla J, Miranda J, Morales C, Olaomi O, Olldashi F, Perel P, Peto R, Ramana PV, Ravi RR, Yutthakasemsunt S, CRASH-2 trial collaborators: Effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events, and blood transfusion in trauma patients with significant haemorrhage (CRASH-2): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2010, 376: 23-32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/13/20/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.