Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

An evaluation of 9-1-1 calls to assess the effectiveness of dispatch-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) instructions: design and methodology

  • Christian Vaillancourt1, 2Email author,
  • Manya L Charette1,
  • Ian G Stiell1, 2 and
  • George A Wells1, 3
BMC Emergency Medicine20088:12

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-8-12

Received: 30 September 2008

Accepted: 05 November 2008

Published: 05 November 2008

Abstract

Background

Cardiac arrest is the leading cause of mortality in Canada, and the overall survival rate for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest rarely exceeds 5%. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been shown to increase survival for cardiac arrest victims. However, bystander CPR rates remain low in Canada, rarely exceeding 15%, despite various attempts to improve them. Dispatch-assisted CPR instructions have the potential to improve rates of bystander CPR and many Canadian urban communities now offer instructions to callers reporting a victim in cardiac arrest. Dispatch-assisted CPR instructions are recommended by the International Guidelines on Emergency Cardiovascular Care, but their ability to improve cardiac arrest survival remains unclear.

Methods/Design

The overall goal of this study is to better understand the factors leading to successful dispatch-assisted CPR instructions and to ultimately save the lives of more cardiac arrest patients. The study will utilize a before-after, prospective cohort design to specifically: 1) Determine the ability of 9-1-1 dispatchers to correctly diagnose cardiac arrest; 2) Quantify the frequency and impact of perceived agonal breathing on cardiac arrest diagnosis; 3) Measure the frequency with which dispatch-assisted CPR instructions can be successfully completed; and 4) Measure the impact of dispatch-assisted CPR instructions on bystander CPR and survival rates.

The study will be conducted in 19 urban communities in Ontario, Canada. All 9-1-1 calls occurring in the study communities reporting out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in victims 16 years of age or older for which resuscitation was attempted will be eligible. Information will be obtained from 9-1-1 call recordings, paramedic patient care reports, base hospital records, fire medical records and hospital medical records. Victim, caller and system characteristics will be measured in the study communities before the introduction of dispatch-assisted CPR instructions (before group), during the introduction (run-in phase), and following the introduction (after group).

Discussion

The study will obtain information essential to the development of clinical trials that will test a variety of educational approaches and delivery methods for telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation instructions. This will be the first study in the world to clearly quantify the impact of dispatch-assisted CPR instructions on survival to hospital discharge for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00664443

Background

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Cardiac arrest refers to the sudden cessation of cardiac mechanical activity as confirmed by the absence of signs of circulation [1]. The victim collapses when the cardiac mechanical activity becomes too limited to provide adequate blood flow and oxygen to the brain and muscles. The victim is perceived to be lifeless if no vital signs are detectable (responsiveness, pulse, respirations). Electrical cardiac activity (ventricular fibrillation [VF], ventricular tachycardia [VT], or pulseless electrical activity [PEA]) seen on a cardiac monitor may become the only sign of vital activity. In the absence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and/or electrical defibrillation, such electrical cardiac activity is followed by asystole and then by death in a matter of minutes.

Cardiac arrest remains the leading cause of mortality in North America. The incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Canada is estimated to be 55 per 100,000 of population [2], resulting in more than 17,875 deaths annually. Coronary artery disease is the most frequent condition leading to cardiac arrest [3]. More than 40% of all deaths from heart disease occur suddenly, and often constitute the victim's first manifestation of heart disease [4]. Sixty-five percent of all cardiac arrests occur outside the hospital setting [5], where the overall rate of survival to hospital discharge rarely exceeds 5% [2]. Survivors have a quality of life (Health Utilities Index Mark 3) similar to the general population [6]. Most cardiac arrest victims are men who are older than age 60, and still active members of society. They collapse in their own home 85% of the time and 50% are witnessed by a family member or bystander [2]. However, bystander CPR rates remain low in Canada, and rarely exceed 15% of all cases in Ontario [2].

The Chain of Survival

The American Heart Association's "Chain of Survival" illustrates important concepts in the community response to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest [7]. The chain metaphor implies that cardiac arrest care is only as strong as its weakest link among the four links in the chain: 1) Early access: When dialling 9-1-1, a caller is put in communication with personnel that will appropriately dispatch police, fire, emergency medical services (EMS), or all three. In the case of a medical emergency, the call will rapidly be transferred to a medical dispatch centre. Dispatch Officers collect information on the nature of the medical emergency and dispatch the appropriate EMS unit(s), often as more information is being collected. 2) Early CPR: CPR can be defined as a succession of lung insufflations and chest compressions performed by a rescuer with the intention of restoring spontaneous circulation. Although police, fire, and EMS paramedics have all been trained to perform CPR in cases of cardiac arrest, it is what occurs during the first minutes before their arrival that is most crucial to the victim. A victim is almost four times more likely to survive a cardiac arrest event when receiving citizen bystander CPR before emergency personnel arrives [OR 3.7 (95% CI 2.5–5.4)] [8]. 3) Early defibrillation: Defibrillation occurs when myocardial cells in a chaotic or abnormal electrical rhythm, VF or VT, are depolarized at the same time by the delivery of an electrical current. This results in the re-establishment of a rhythmic and organized heart beat. Defibrillation can only occur when the heart exhibits disorganized electrical activity and is never successful in the case of asystole or PEA. 4) Early Advanced Care: Advanced cardiac life support care is defined by the use of definitive airway management such as endotracheal intubation, intravenous access and administration of drugs. Such drugs serve the purpose of increasing the coronary perfusion pressure by increasing peripheral vascular resistance (Epinephrine, Vasopressin), or to promote arrhythmia termination either alone by acting on myocardial cell electric action potential and/or by facilitating defibrillation (Lidocaine, Procainamide, Amiodarone). This being said, early advanced care failed to improve survival to hospital discharge in the largest prospective prehospital study conducted to date [8].

Cardiac arrest location and public access defibrillation (PAD) programs

Following the publication of the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) trial in 2004 [9], PAD programs received the highest endorsement from the American Heart Association. This study randomized community units to one of two emergency response systems consisting of either lay volunteers trained in CPR alone, or in CPR and the use of Automatic External Defibrillators (AED). Survival to hospital discharge from a cardiac arrest occurring in a public location increased as a result of the AED program [Relative Risk 2.0 (95% CI 1.07 to 3.77); P = 0.03] [9].

Unfortunately, since 85% of all cardiac arrests occur in a residential location [2], even the highest achievable survival rate in the remaining 15% of cardiac arrests occurring in a public location would have a limited impact on overall cardiac arrest survival. Stakeholders should consider the issues surrounding the implementation of a residential-access defibrillation program, and/or an alternative intervention most susceptible to improve bystander CPR rates in residential locations.

Low bystander CPR rates

Data from Seattle indicates that a survival rate of 30% can be achieved for witnessed VF cardiac arrest victims receiving bystander CPR [10]. Other communities such as Akita and Otsu, Japan report overall survival rates from cardiac arrest of 15% and 9%, respectively, in association with bystander CPR rates of 49% and 29% [11]. In comparison, citizen bystander CPR and overall survival rates are rather modest in most Canadian provinces, rarely exceeding 15% and 5% respectively [2].

Various attempts have been made to improve bystander CPR rates in the past. Two very popular and contrasting approaches are mass CPR training events and targeted CPR training of family members of patients suffering from cardiovascular disease. The objective of the mass CPR training is to teach as many CPR providers as possible from the general population in a group setting. Although mass CPR training events can reach groups of a few hundred to thousands of participants at a time [1215], these events usually attract young participants unlikely to witness cardiac arrest. In addition, they are not cost-effective [16] and their effect on survival has not been demonstrated. Targeting the population at large may not achieve the desired goal [17, 18].

The second approach, targeted CPR training, involves spouses and other family members of cardiac arrest victims, the people most likely to witness the event [1921]. Many authors have suggested targeting family members of patients with known cardiovascular disease for CPR training [2233]. As few as 9% of this target group have generally received CPR training whereas the highest rate is found in Detroit at 47.4% [21, 3437]. Interest in CPR training appears to decrease with advancing age [3842]. When a group of elders were asked why they had not sought CPR training in the past, most gave no specific reason, or mentioned the inconvenience of having to leave the house, bad health, or cost [43, 44]. Some respondents did not understand why they should learn CPR when they can call 9-1-1 [45]. On the other hand, CPR training was shown to decrease anxiety, and increase emotional adjustment in family members of cardiac arrest survivors [4648]. Many victims of cardiac arrest never had any documented cardiovascular disease preceding the event; therefore, targeting family members of patients with known cardiovascular disease may not achieve the desired goal either.

A systematic review of the literature on bystander CPR has recently been published [49]. Based on an extensive review of the evidence available at the time, the authors indicated that there is support (in the form of at least one good quality randomized controlled trial) for the following as potential ways of increasing low bystander CPR rates: 1) 9-1-1 dispatch-assisted CPR instructions, 2) teaching CPR to family members of cardiac patients, 3) using self training videos to learn CPR, 4) maximizing the time spent using manikins during CPR training, and 5) teaching the concepts of ambiguity and diffusion of responsibility. Mass CPR training events were not supported by the literature as a way of increasing low bystander CPR rates.

Irrespective of the teaching method, retention of CPR knowledge and skills is poor [5052]. The Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada currently recommends yearly retraining [53]. There is a large amount of literature demonstrating a significant decrease in CPR knowledge and skills after one year [5466]. Trainees may go back to pre-training levels as early as six months after their CPR class [6771]. Some evidence exists that re-training may be protective against a decline in CPR skills [72].

It appears that dispatch-assisted CPR instructions could represent the best CPR training alternative thus far. This intervention combines the benefits of training a large number of citizens with the highly targeted approach of providing CPR teaching or reminders to 9-1-1 callers reporting a victim in cardiac arrest. In addition, it partially circumvents the issue of knowledge and skill decay with time.

Dispatch-assisted CPR instructions

In Canada, once the presence of a medical emergency has been established, 9-1-1 callers are rapidly put in communication with a medical dispatch centre. Dispatch Officers working at the medical dispatch centre can be a paramedic, a nurse, or a non-health care professional. Many medical dispatch centres in Canada, however, employ dispatchers with no professional health care background. The dispatchers receive six weeks of training with an instructor in order to learn how to navigate a set of dispatch instructions and this is followed by a six-month preceptorship. Dispatch Officers must recognize and process a large number of medical emergencies. They follow algorithms as part of a "dispatch protocol". Each question asked by the Dispatch Officer of the 9-1-1 caller is standardized such that a given set of instructions will be initiated for a specific medical emergency. For cardiac arrest, Dispatch Officers initiate CPR instructions over the telephone while emergency response vehicles are on their way to the location.

There are several types of "dispatch protocols" available on the market. Dr. Jeff Clawson and the National Academies of Emergency Dispatch have developed the Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS). It is used in most North American cities and in some European communities. Ontario uses a different dispatch system developed by the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Niagara Falls and Toronto are the only communities using the MPDS in Ontario. With regard to dispatch-assisted CPR instructions, there is only one major difference between the two systems – chest compressions and mouth-to-mouth are still being taught by Ontario Dispatch Officers whereas the MPDS teaches chest compressions only.

Agonal breathing and the ability to recognize cardiac arrest

In the first minutes following cardiac arrest, some victims will take short, laboured, noisy gasping breaths. This abnormal breathing, otherwise known as agonal breathing, could be present in as many as 30% of all cardiac arrest victims, but a large observational study is needed to confirm these numbers. Agonal breathing may limit the ability of Dispatch Officers to make a diagnosis of cardiac arrest [73, 74]. Some evidence suggests that agonal breathing can be misinterpreted as a sign of life, resulting in the inappropriate withholding of dispatch-assisted CPR instructions. The ability of Dispatch Officers to accurately detect cardiac arrest over the telephone ranges between 68% and 90% in some studies [75, 76].

In contrast, in a review of the Seattle experience, Dispatch Officers initiated CPR instructions after erroneously making the diagnosis of cardiac arrest over the telephone 14% of the time [77]. For various reasons, since telephone CPR instructions do not always result in CPR being performed on the victim, only 4.3% of victims believed to be in cardiac arrest erroneously received CPR [77]. This is consistent with the 2005 International Consensus Guidelines on CPR in that, when in doubt about the presence or absence of signs of life, it is recommended to err on the safe side and initiate CPR. No adverse events were reported in the small group receiving CPR erroneously.

Ability of 9-1-1 callers to follow dispatch-assisted CPR instructions

Two studies of recorded 9-1-1 calls determined that CPR instructions were appropriate and possible in only 30% to 37% of all confirmed cardiac arrest cases [78, 79]. While a majority of callers were emotionally capable of following instructions [75, 80, 81], the telephone was not in close range of the victim as often as 50% of the time [8082]. Many of these studies are now more than 10 years old; with the introduction of cell phones and cordless phones, the ability of providing CPR instructions over the telephone likely has improved significantly.

It also appears that ventilation instructions over the telephone can be relatively time consuming. In a randomized, controlled study by Hallstrom, it took an additional 1.4 minutes to complete the mouth-to-mouth instructions compared to doing immediate chest compressions without ventilations [83]. In some cases, this additional delay can result in the paramedics arriving before the chest compressions are initiated. Although results from the Hallstrom study did not reach statistical significance, survival to hospital discharge appeared to favour the chest-compression only group compared to traditional CPR with ventilation instructions (14.6% vs. 10.4%; P = 0.18) [84]. Currently, most 9-1-1 dispatch centers no longer offer ventilation instructions to callers reporting a witnessed cardiac arrest victim whose collapse occurred less than 10 minutes prior to the call.

Pilot evaluation of dispatch-assisted CPR instructions in Ottawa, Canada

We recently conducted a pilot observational cohort study evaluating the frequency of agonal breathing during cardiac arrest, its impact on the ability of Dispatch Officers to recognize cardiac arrest, and the impact of dispatch-assisted CPR instructions on bystander CPR rates in Ottawa, Canada [85].

Audio recordings of all out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases over two successive nine-month periods were obtained. The nine-month periods corresponded to the periods before and after the introduction of dispatch-assisted CPR instructions. There were 529 cardiac arrest cases during the two periods between July 1st, 2003 and December 31st, 2004 [85]. Victim characteristics were similar in the before (N = 295) and after (N = 234) phase: mean age was 68.3, 66.7% were male, collapse was witnessed 50.1% of the time, the mean time interval between 9-1-1 call to vehicle stop at the scene was 6:37 min:sec, VF/VT was present in 29.9%, and survival to hospital discharge was 4.0%. We located 82.1% of 9-1-1 recordings for the after period. Callers were female 63.5% of the time, the victim's spouses 29.2% of the time, and previously trained in CPR 24.0% of the time. Dispatch Officers recognized 56.0% (95% CI 48.9–63.0%) of cardiac arrest cases; agonal breathing was present in 37.0% (95% CI 30.1–43.9%) of all cardiac arrest cases and accounted for 50.0% (95% CI 39.1–60.9%) of missed diagnoses. CPR instructions were offered to 75.9% and accepted by 53.7% of callers; 26.3% declined instructions because of prior CPR training. 17.2% and 8.3% of callers provided ventilations and chest compressions as a result of the intervention. The longest delays occurred between call-to-cardiac arrest diagnosis (2:38), and during ventilation instructions (2:05). Bystander CPR rates increased from 16.7% to 26.4% (AR 9.7%; 95% CI 8.5–11.3% p = 0.006).

Before the introduction of dispatch-assisted CPR instructions, no other intervention had succeeded in improving bystander CPR rates in the community of Ottawa, Canada. The pilot project allowed the authors to determine the feasibility of collecting information of interest. The next logical step is to conduct a large, multi-centre trial in order to best evaluate the impact of dispatch-assisted CPR instructions.

Objectives

The overall goal of this study is to better understand the factors leading to successful dispatch-assisted CPR instructions. This is essential in order to intervene to improve the effectiveness of these instructions, to further improve bystander CPR rates, and to save more victims of cardiac arrest. Specific objectives are to:

1) Determine the ability of Dispatch Officers to correctly diagnose cardiac arrest over the telephone;

2) Quantify the frequency and impact of perceived agonal breathing on cardiac arrest diagnosis by Dispatch Officers;

3) Measure the frequency with which dispatch-assisted CPR instructions can be successfully completed in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases; and

4) Measure the impact of dispatch-assisted CPR instructions on bystander CPR rates and survival for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Methods

Study design and setting

This study will combine a before-after design with a prospective cohort design (Figure 1). Objective 4 (bystander CPR and survival rates) will be addressed using a before-after design, the "before" phase occurring prior to 2004, and the prospective "after" phase starting in 2007 (after the run-in period). Objectives 1, 2, and 3 will be addressed with a prospective cohort starting in 2007. The prospective cohort group and the "after" group will be the same group.
Figure 1

Study design and proposed statistical analyses.

The study will take place in 19 large and small cities located in Ontario, Canada affiliated with 11 base hospital programs. The combined population in those 19 communities is 2,903,887 and ranges between 15,605 and 774,072 (2001 Statistics Canada census). Approximately 1,703 patients suffer cardiac arrest each year and receive treatment in these communities. All communities have sophisticated EMS services with first responding fire fighters and second-tier primary care (BLS-D) and advanced care (ALS) paramedics. All centres have been collecting high-quality data on system and cardiac arrest victim characteristics since 1994, and all have initiated dispatch-assisted CPR instructions between 2004 and 2005.

Study population

All patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (absence of a detectable pulse, unresponsiveness and apnea) meeting the following criteria will be enrolled in the study:

a) presumed cardiac origin;

b) occurring in an eligible study community; and

c) for which resuscitation is attempted by a bystander and/or the emergency responders; or for which dispatch-assisted CPR instructions are being provided.

Case definitions will follow the Utstein Style guidelines for reporting cardiac arrest data [1].

Patients meeting any of the following criteria will be excluded:

a) patients younger than 16 years (cardiac arrest usually respiratory and rare in this population);

b) patients who are "obviously dead" as defined by the Ambulance Act of Ontario (decomposition, rigor mortis, decapitation, or other);

c) trauma victims, including hanging and burns; or

d) patients with cardiac arrests clearly of other non-cardiac origin including drug overdose, carbon monoxide poisoning, drowning, exsanguination, electrocution, asphyxia, hypoxia related to respiratory disease, cerebrovascular accident, and documented terminal illness.

Method of assessment and data collection

Diagnosis of Cardiac Arrest by Dispatch Officers

According to protocols, Dispatch Officers assume the presence of cardiac arrest when the 9-1-1 caller describes a victim that is lifeless (victim is unresponsive, not breathing, or not breathing normally). Dispatch Officers will notify the medical dispatch centre after every occasion where assisted CPR instructions were initiated. Using a unique identifier, these interventions/cases will later be cross-referenced with the regional cardiac arrest registry for measuring diagnostic accuracy. In addition, a research assistant will later listen to the recordings of each cardiac arrest intervention and document on a standardized and piloted data collection form the reasons why cardiac arrest may not have been recognized by the Dispatch Officer.

Diagnosis of Cardiac Arrest of Cardiac Origin

In order to verify the diagnostic accuracy of Dispatch Officers, the status of a cardiac arrest victim will be confirmed using the Utstein definition for cardiac arrest of cardiac origin [1].

Cardiac arrest will first be documented at the scene by the paramedic crew, and subsequently confirmed by the base hospital physician or coroner. Cardiac arrest will be defined as per the Utstein criteria for reporting data on cardiac arrest research.

Agonal breathing

Can be defined as abnormal breathing, gurgling sound, moaning, or otherwise. Dispatchers Officers are required by protocol to inquire about the presence or absence of agonal or abnormal breathing. A research assistant at each base hospital will systematically review the recordings of all cardiac arrest calls, and use a piloted data collection form to independently document the presence or absence of agonal breathing, as described by the 9-1-1 caller to the Dispatch Officer. Consistency in recognizing agonal breathing among research assistants will be assured with the use of training 9-1-1 communication material before the study starts.

Successful Completion of Dispatch-Assisted CPR Instructions

is defined as CPR instructions provided by a Dispatch Officer to a 9-1-1 caller reporting a cardiac arrest victim, resulting in the administration of chest compressions to that victim by a bystander before EMS arrival. Once again, a research assistant will systematically review the recordings of all cardiac arrest calls using a standardized and piloted data collection form in order to collect information on variables pertaining to the successful delivery of dispatch-assisted CPR instructions. Paramedics are required by protocol to document if bystander CPR was ongoing before their arrival.

Bystander CPR

"Bystander" CPR is performed by a person who is not part of an organized emergency medical system. The presence or absence of ongoing bystander CPR will be assessed by the first member of the emergency response team to arrive at scene, and will be documented.

Survival to Hospital Discharge

is defined as survival of a cardiac arrest victim to hospital discharge. Survival to hospital discharge will be assessed via hospital medical records or via the coroner's office.

Data analysis

Cardiac Arrest Recognition

Sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves will be computed.

Agonal Breathing

Descriptive statistics with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI), and kappa statistics with 95% CI will be calculated to measure the level of agreement between the dispatcher and the research assistant during the study, and among research assistants using training materials before the study.

Dispatch-Assisted CPR Instructions

Descriptive statistics with 95% CIs will be calculated to describe successes in various stages of the implementation of CPR instructions, to describe the caller's receptiveness of the instructions, and various time delays occurring during dispatch-assisted CPR instructions.

Bystander CPR and Survival Rates

Descriptive statistics with 95% CIs will be calculated for bystander CPR and survival rates. In addition, two statistical modelling approaches will be considered: 1) A univariate and a stepwise logistic regression analysis to control for potential confounding effects of variables possibly associated with bystander CPR and survival rates. These variables include age, gender, initial cardiac rhythm, and EMS response time intervals. Bystander CPR rates and cardiac arrest survival rates in the "before" phase (prior to 2004) will be compared to the "after" phase (after the run-in period finishing in 2006) controlling for these confounding variables. 2) A time series analysis to analyse trends (quarterly) over the whole study period (including the run-in phase), and identify a possible point of inflection due to the implementation of dispatch-assisted CPR instructions. This will determine if bystander CPR and survival rate inflections are significant, controlling for trends over time. This analysis will be performed for each community and then the results may be combined in a meta-analysis after assessing homogeneity of the results across the communities.

Sample size

The main objective of this study is to measure the effect of dispatch-assisted CPR instructions on survival to hospital discharge for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims. The required sample size has been estimated based on a dichotomous response variable from two independent samples (before and after the introduction of dispatch-assisted CPR instructions). The required sample size is based on an expected survival rate of 5% in the before group (based on previous studies conducted in the study communities [8]), an expected survival rate of 7% in the after group (based on mathematical modelling and scientific reports), an average survival rate of 6% for all study participants and a 2% minimal clinically important difference in survival rate. Using these figures and setting power at 90%, 2,962 cardiac arrest victims will be required for each group.

Ethics approval

Research ethics board approval was obtained from The Ottawa Hospital (protocol #2007233-01H). As the study will not affect usual practice, there were no specific ethical concerns. Informed consent is not required because it is impossible to obtain in emergency situations such as cardiac arrest, and because patients will not be randomized to receive different therapies. No identifying information on either the dispatcher or the patient will be recorded.

Discussion

Dispatch-assisted CPR instructions are relatively new in the field of cardiac arrest resuscitation. Their delivery methods are based on limited scientific evidence, and need to be further optimized. This study will provide essential information on modifiable factors to improve the quality of dispatch-assisted CPR instructions, further improve bystander CPR rates, and save more cardiac arrest victims. First, we will identify modifiable factors that could increase the current cardiac arrest diagnostic accuracy of Dispatch Officers. Second, we will quantify the impact of agonal breathing on the Dispatch Officer's diagnostic accuracy in order to develop educational strategies designed to help them recognize this condition. Third, we will identify modifiable factors influencing the ability of 9-1-1 callers to comply with CPR instructions provided over the telephone. Finally, we will convincingly determine the impact of dispatch-assisted CPR instructions on bystander CPR and survival rates.

This information is essential to develop clinical trials testing a variety of educational approaches and delivery methods for telephone CPR instructions. This will be the first study worldwide to clearly quantify the impact of dispatch-assisted CPR instructions on survival to hospital discharge for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims. We anticipate our study will show that dispatch-assisted CPR instructions contributed to saving as many as 40 lives per year in the participating centres alone, and as much as 360 lives annually in Canada.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study is funded by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research. (grant # FRN 84269)

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Ottawa Health Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology Program
(2)
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa
(3)
Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa

References

  1. Jacobs I, Nadkarni V, Bahr J, Berg RA, Billi JE, Bossaert L, Cassan P, Coovadia A, D'Este K, Finn J, et al: Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: update and simplification of the Utstein templates for resuscitation registries. A statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the international liaison committee on resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2004, 63: 233-249. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.09.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Vaillancourt C, Stiell IG, Canadian Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Team (CCORT): Cardiac arrest care and emergency medical services in Canada. Can J Cardiol. 2004, 20: 1081-1090.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Neumar RW, Ward KR: Cardiopulmonary Arrest. Emergency Medicine Concepts and Clinical Practice. Edited by: Rosen P. 1998, St. Louis: Mosby, 1: 35-60. 4Google Scholar
  4. Messner T, Lundberg V: Trends in sudden cardiac death in the northern Sweden MONICA area 1985–99. J Int Med. 2003, 253: 320-328. 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2003.01102.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Zheng ZJ, Croft JB, Giles WH, Mensah GA: Sudden cardiac death in the United States, 1989 to 1998. Circulation. 2001, 104: 2158-2163. 10.1161/hc4301.098254.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Stiell I, Nichol G, Wells G, De Maio V, Nesbitt L, Blackburn J, Spaite D, Group OS: Health-related quality of life is better for cardiac arrest survivors who received citizen cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation. 2003, 108: 1939-1944. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000095028.95929.B0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cummins RO, Ornato JP, Thies WH, Pepe PE: Improving survival from sudden cardiac arrest: the "chain of survival" concept. A statement for health professionals from the Advanced Cardiac Life Support Subcommittee and the Emergency Cardiac Care Committee, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1991, 83: 1832-1847.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Field B, Spaite DW, Nesbitt LP, De Maio VJ, Nichol G, Cousineau D, Blackburn J, Munkley D, et al: Advanced cardiac life support in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2004, 351: 647-656. 10.1056/NEJMoa040325.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hallstrom AP, Ornato JP, Weisfeldt M, Travers A, Christenson J, McBurnie MA, Zalenski R, Becker LB, Schron EB, Proschan M, Public Access Defibrillation Trial I: Public-access defibrillation and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2004, 351: 637-646. 10.1056/NEJMoa040566.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. McCarthy M: Looking after your neighbours Seattle-style. Lancet. 1998, 351: 732-10.1016/S0140-6736(05)78508-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Sekimoto M, Noguchi Y, Rahman M, Hira K, Fukui M, Enzan K, Inaba H, Fukui T: Estimating the effect of bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation in Japan. Resuscitation. 2001, 50: 153-160. 10.1016/S0300-9572(01)00330-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Larkin GL, Marco CA: Who knows cpr?: a national survey. Acad Emerg Med. 2001, 8: 434-435.Google Scholar
  13. Fong YT, Anantharaman V, Lim SH, Leong KF, Pokkan G: Mass cardiopulmonary resuscitation 99–survey results of a multi-organisational effort in public education in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2001, 49: 201-205. 10.1016/S0300-9572(01)00312-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Pane GA, Salness KA: A survey of participants in a mass CPR training course. Ann Emerg Med. 1987, 16: 1112-1116. 10.1016/S0196-0644(87)80466-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Selby ML, Kautz JA, Moore TJ, Gombeski WR, Ramirez AG, Farge EJ, Forthofer RN: Indicators of response to a mass media CPR recruitment campaign. Am J Public Health. 1982, 72: 1039-1042.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Swor R, Compton S: Estimating cost-effectiveness of mass cardiopulmonary resuscitation training strategies to improve survival from cardiac arrest in private locations. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2004, 8: 420-423. 10.1016/j.prehos.2004.06.012.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Axelsson A, Herlitz J, Ekstrom L, Holmberg S: Bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation out-of-hospital. A first description of the bystanders and their experiences. Resuscitation. 1996, 33: 3-11. 10.1016/S0300-9572(96)00993-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Brennan RT, Braslow A: Are we training the right people yet? A survey of participants in public cardiopulmonary resuscitation classes. Resuscitation. 1998, 37: 21-25. 10.1016/S0300-9572(98)00026-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Swor RA, Jackson RE, Walters BL, Rivera EJ, Chu KH: Impact of lay responder actions on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcome. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2000, 4: 38-42. 10.1080/10903120090941623.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Waalewijn RA, Tijssen JG, Koster RW: Bystander initiated actions in out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: results from the Amsterdam Resuscitation Study (ARRESUST). Resuscitation. 2001, 50: 273-279. 10.1016/S0300-9572(01)00354-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Swor RA, Jackson RE, Compton S, Domeier R, Zalenski R, Honeycutt L, Kuhn GJ, Frederiksen S, Pascual RG: Cardiac arrest in private locations: different strategies are needed to improve outcome. Resuscitation. 2003, 58: 171-176. 10.1016/S0300-9572(03)00118-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Alderman C: Emergency bystander life support training. Emerg Nurse. 1997, 5: 10-11.Google Scholar
  23. Eisenberg MS, Bergner L, Hallstrom A: Cardiac resuscitation in the community. Importance of rapid provision and implications for program planning. J Am Med Assoc. 1979, 241: 1905-1907. 10.1001/jama.241.18.1905.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Anonymous: Standards and guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardiac Care (ECC). National Academy of Sciences – National Research Council. J Am Med Assoc. 1986, 255: 2905-2989. 10.1001/jama.255.21.2905.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Arntz HR, Staedecke-Peine C, Brueggemann T, Stern R, Andresen D, Schmidt S, Willich SN: Sudden cardiac death: Is it really an unforseeable event?. Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin. 1999, 36: 485-492. 10.1007/s003900050268.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Axelsson A, Thoren A, Holmberg S, Herlitz J: Attitudes of trained Swedish lay rescuers toward CPR performance in an emergency. A survey of 1012 recently trained CPR rescuers. Resuscitation. 2000, 44: 27-36. 10.1016/S0300-9572(99)00160-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Bachman JW: The Good Neighbor Rescue Program: utilizing volunteers to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a rural community. J Fam Prac. 1983, 16: 561-566.Google Scholar
  28. Bahr J: CPR education in the community. Eur J Emerg Med. 1994, 1: 190-192.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Baskett PJ: Teaching the public cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Br J Hosp Med. 1992, 48: 447-451.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Chehardy P, Doherty A, Dracup K, Handley AJ, Hawkins H, Juarbe TC, Kloeck WG, Lynch BC, Mancini MB, Mason P, et al: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Education. Ann Emerg Med. 2001, 37: S49-59. 10.1067/mem.2001.114177.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Jackson RE, Swor RA: Who gets bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a witnessed arrest?. Acad Emerg Med. 1997, 4: 540-544. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1997.tb03574.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lie KG, Richardson M: Attitudes of health professionals toward cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for family members of cardiac patients. Coron Health Care. 1999, 3: 91-98. 10.1016/S1362-3265(99)80021-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Chu KH, May CR, Clark MJ, Breeze KM: CPR training in households of patients with chest pain. Resuscitation. 2003, 57: 257-268. 10.1016/S0300-9572(03)00039-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kivela SL: Resuscitation skills among the population. Acta Anaesthesiolog Scan. 1982, 26: 626-627.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Lyda KK, Perez MA, Chng CL: Cardiorespiratory resuscitation training among individuals aged 60 and above. Am J Health Behav. 1998, 22: 54-61.Google Scholar
  36. Mandel LP, Cobb LA, Weaver WD: CPR training for patients' families: do physicians recommend it?. Am J Public Health. 1987, 77: 727-728.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Swor RA, Jackson RE, Vining F, Farr L, Kokko S, Compton SA, Pascual RG: Elder-perceived Self-efficacy and Attitudes toward CPR Training. Acad Emerg Med. 2001, 8:Google Scholar
  38. Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, Love DG, Ockene JK, Dalen JE: Layperson CPR–are we training the right people?. Ann Emerg Med. 1984, 13: 701-704. 10.1016/S0196-0644(84)80731-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Flabouris A: Ethnicity and proficiency in English as factors affecting community cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) class attendance. Resuscitation. 1996, 32: 95-103. 10.1016/0300-9572(96)00942-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Keim S, Anderson K, Siegel E, Spaite D, Valenzuela T: Factors associated with CPR certification within an elderly community. Resuscitation. 2001, 51: 269-274. 10.1016/S0300-9572(01)00418-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lejeune PO, Delooz HH: Why did persons invited to train in cardiopulmonary resuscitation not do so?. Eur Heart Jl. 1987, 8: 224-228.Google Scholar
  42. Demirovic J: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation programs revisited: results of a community study among older African Americans. Am J Geriatr Cardiol. 2004, 13: 182-187. 10.1111/j.1076-7460.2004.02525.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Dracup K, Moser DK, Guzy PM, Taylor SE, Marsden C: Is cardiopulmonary resuscitation training deleterious for family members of cardiac patients?. Am J Public Health. 1994, 84: 116-118.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Kliegel A, Scheinecker W, Sterz F, Eisenburger P, Holzer M, Laggner AN: The attitudes of cardiac arrest survivors and their family members towards CPR courses. Resuscitation. 2000, 47: 147-154. 10.1016/S0300-9572(00)00214-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Messmer PR, Jones SG: Saving lives. An innovative approach for teaching CPR. Nursing & Health Care Perspectives. 1998, 19: 108-110.Google Scholar
  46. McLauchlan CA, Ward A, Murphy NM, Griffith MJ, Skinner DV, Camm AJ: Resuscitation training for cardiac patients and their relatives–its effect on anxiety. Resuscitation. 1992, 24: 7-11. 10.1016/0300-9572(92)90168-C.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Moser DK, Dracup K: Impact of cardiopulmonary resuscitation training on perceived control in spouses of recovering cardiac patients. Res Nurs Health. 2000, 23: 270-278. 10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<270::AID-NUR3>3.0.CO;2-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Nelson KM: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for families of cardiac patients. Cardiovasc Nurs. 1979, 15: 28-32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Vaillancourt C, Stiell IG, Wells GA: Understanding and improving low bystander CPR rates: a systematic review of the literature. Can J Emerg Med Care. 2008, 10: 51-65.Google Scholar
  50. Jabbour M, Osmond MH, Klassen TP: Life support courses: are they effective?. Ann Emerg Med. 1996, 28: 690-698. 10.1016/S0196-0644(96)70095-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Eisenburger P, Safar P: Life supporting first aid training of the public–review and recommendations. Resuscitation. 1999, 41: 3-18. 10.1016/S0300-9572(99)00034-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Anonymous: American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on School Health. Basic life support training school. Pediatrics. 1993, 91: 158-159.Google Scholar
  53. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada: Instructor Resource for Basic Life Support. 2001, Ottawa: Desktop PublishingGoogle Scholar
  54. Alvarez Hd, Cobb LA: Experiences with CPR training of the general public. National Conference on Standards for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiac Care Dallas, American Heart Assoc. 1975, 205: 34-7.Google Scholar
  55. Van Kerschaver E, Delooz HH, Moens GF: The effectiveness of repeated cardiopulmonary resuscitation training in a school population. Resuscitation. 1989, 17: 211-222. 10.1016/0300-9572(89)90037-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Gombeski WR, Effron DM, Ramirez AG, Moore TJ: Impact on retention: comparison of two CPR training programs. Am J Public Health. 1982, 72: 849-852.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Mandel LP, Cobb LA: Reinforcing CPR skills without mannequin practice. Ann Emerg Med. 1987, 16: 1117-1120. 10.1016/S0196-0644(87)80467-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Dracup K, Breu C: Teaching and retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills for families of high-risk patients with cardiac disease. Focus on Critical Care. 1987, 14: 67-72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Nelson M, Brown CG: CPR instruction: modular versus lecture course. Ann Emerg Med. 1984, 13: 118-121. 10.1016/S0196-0644(84)80574-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Berden HJ, Willems FF, Hendrick JM, Pijls NH, Knape JT: How frequently should basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation training be repeated to maintain adequate skills?. Br Med J. 1993, 306: 1576-1577.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Fossel M, Kiskaddon R, Sternbach G: Retention of CPR skills by medical students. J Med Educ. 1983, 568-575.Google Scholar
  62. Mancini ME, Kaye W: The effect of time since training on house officers' retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills. Am J Emerg Med. 1985, 3: 31-32. 10.1016/0735-6757(85)90008-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Moser DK, Coleman S: Recommendations for improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills retention. Heart & Lung. 1992, 21: 372-380.Google Scholar
  64. Moser DK, Dracup K, Guzy PM, Taylor SE, Breu C: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills retention in family members of cardiac patients. Am J Emerg Med. 1990, 8: 498-503. 10.1016/0735-6757(90)90150-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Sefrin P, Schafer R: [Resuscitation by laymen?]. Anasthesie, Intensivtherapie, Notfallmedizin. 1986, 21: 273-279. 10.1055/s-2007-1002483.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Wilson E, Brooks B, Tweed WA: CPR skills retention of lay basic rescuers. Ann Emerg Med. 1983, 12: 482-484. 10.1016/S0196-0644(83)80643-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Watson LA: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Competencies of Nurses and Ninth Grade Students. Dissertation Abstracts International. 1980, 41: 3896-Google Scholar
  68. Gass DA, Curry L: Physicians' and nurses' retention of knowledge and skill after training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Can Med Assoc J. 1983, 128: 550-551.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Su E, Schmidt TA, Mann NC, Zechnich AD: A randomized controlled trial to assess decay in acquired knowledge among paramedics completing a pediatric resuscitation course. Acad Emerg Med. 2000, 7: 779-786. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb02270.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Weaver FJ, Ramirez AG, Dorfman SB, Raizner AE: Trainees' retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. How quickly they forget. J Am Med Assoc. 1979, 241: 901-903. 10.1001/jama.241.9.901.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Morgan CL, Donnelly PD, Lester CA, Assar DH: Effectiveness of the BBC's 999 training roadshows on cardiopulmonary resuscitation: video performance of cohort of unforewarned participants at home six months afterwards. Br Med J. 1996, 313: 912-916.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Chamberlain D, Smith A, Woollard M, Colquhoun M, Handley AJ, Leaves S, Kern KB: Trials of teaching methods in basic life support (3): comparison of simulated CPR performance after first training and at 6 months, with a note on the value of re-training. Resuscitation. 2002, 53: 179-187. 10.1016/S0300-9572(02)00025-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Bang A, Herlitz J, Martinell S: Interaction between emergency medical dispatcher and caller in suspected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest calls with focus on agonal breathing. A review of 100 tape recordings of true cardiac arrest cases. Resuscitation. 2003, 56: 25-34. 10.1016/S0300-9572(02)00278-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Hauff SR, Rea TD, Culley LL, Kerry F, Becker L, Eisenberg MS: Factors impeding dispatcher-assisted telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Ann Emerg Med. 2003, 42: 731-737. 10.1016/S0196-0644(03)00423-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Bang A, Biber B, Isaksson L, Lindqvist J, Herlitz J: Evaluation of dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Eur J Emerg Med. 1999, 6: 175-183.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Garza AG, Gratton MC, Chen JJ, Carlson B: The accuracy of predicting cardiac arrest by emergency medical services dispatchers: the calling party effect. Acad Emerg Med. 2003, 10: 955-960. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00651.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Hallstrom AP, Cobb LA, Johnson E, Copass MK: Dispatcher assisted CPR: implementation and potential benefit. A 12-year study. Resuscitation. 2003, 57: 123-129. 10.1016/S0300-9572(03)00005-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Bang A, Herlitz J, Holmberg S: Possibilities of implementing dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the community. An evaluation of 99 consecutive out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. Resuscitation. 2000, 44: 19-26. 10.1016/S0300-9572(99)00163-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Clark RD, Word LE: Why don't bystanders help? Because of ambiguity?. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1972, 24: 392-400. 10.1037/h0033717.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Cooke MW, Wilson S: Are 999 callers in a position to give triage information and receive first aid advice?. Pre Hospital Immediate Care. 1998, 2: 193-196.Google Scholar
  81. Meron G, Frantz O, Sterz F, Mullner M, Kaff A, Laggner AN: Analysing calls by lay persons reporting cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 1996, 32: 23-26. 10.1016/0300-9572(96)00963-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Culley LL, Clark JJ, Eisenberg MS, Larsen MP: Dispatcher-assisted telephone CPR: common delays and time standards for delivery. Ann Emerg Med. 1991, 20: 362-366. 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)81655-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Hallstrom A, Cobb L, Johnson E, Copass M: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation by chest compression alone or with mouth-to-mouth ventilation. N Engl J Med. 2000, 342: 1546-1553. 10.1056/NEJM200005253422101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Hallstrom A, Cobb L, Johnson E, Copass M: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation by chest compression alone or with mouth-to-mouth ventilation. N Engl J Med. 2000, 342: 1546-1553. 10.1056/NEJM200005253422101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Vaillancourt C, Verma A, Trickett J, Crete D, Beaudoin T, Nesbitt L, Wells GA, Stiell IG, et al: Evaluating the effectiveness of dispatch-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation instructions. Acad Emerg Med. 2007, 14: 877-883.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/8/12/prepub

Copyright

© Vaillancourt et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement