Table 4 Correlation between the FS-ICU 24 dimensions and demographic factors (N = 57)
From: Family satisfaction in the intensive care unit, a cross-sectional study from Norway
Factors with variables | n | Dimension | P -value | Effect size, r |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender (Male/Female) | 57 | FS-Care | .380 | .116 |
FS-DM | .675 | .055 | ||
FS-Total | .431 | .104 | ||
Age dichotomy (>65yrs/≤65yrs.) | 57 | FS-Care | .605 | .069 |
FS-DM | .981 | .003 | ||
FS-Total | .872 | .021 | ||
Earlier experience with ICU (Experience/No experience) | 53 | FS-Care | .906 | .016 |
FS-DM | .254 | .157 | ||
FS-Total | .617 | .069 | ||
Contact with ICU (Visit/Visit + telephone call) | 56 | FS-Care | .204 | .169 |
FS-DM | .624 | .006 | ||
FS-Total | .414 | .109 | ||
Relationship to the patient (Partner/Other relationship) | 57 | FS-Care | .724 | .047 |
FS-DM | .026 | .296 | ||
FS-Total | .158 | .187 | ||
Relationship to the patient (Child of patient/ Not child of patient) | 57 | FS-Care | 1.000 | .000 |
FS-DM | .087 | .226 | ||
FS-Total | .407 | .109 | ||
Place of residence (in same city as hospital/elsewhere) | 57 | FS-Care | .216 | .164 |
FS-DM | .112 | .211 | ||
FS-Total | .255 | .151 | ||
Intensive care patient’s outcome (survived/died) | 57 | FS-Care | .407 | .110 |
FS-DM | .010 | .343 | ||
FS-Total | .053 | .257 |