Bull C, Byrnes J, Hettiarachchi R, Downes M. A systematic review of the validity and reliability of patient-reported experience measures. Health Serv Res. 2019;54(5):1023–35.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Kingsley C, Patel S. Patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures. Bja Educ. 2017;17(4):137–44.
Article
Google Scholar
Vaillancourt S, Cullen JD, Dainty KN, Inrig T, Laupacis A, Linton D, et al. PROM-ED: development and testing of a patient-reported outcome measure for emergency department patients who are discharged home. Ann Emerg Med. 2020;76(2):219–29.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The CAHPS Program Rockville, MD: AHRQ; 2012 [updated October 2018; cited 2021 July]. Available from: https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/about-cahps/cahps-program/index.html.
NEJM Catalyst. What is pay for performance in healthcare? UK: NEJM Catalyst; 2018 [updated 1 March 2018; cited 2021 July]. Available from: https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.18.0245.
Care Quality Commission. NHS Patient Surveys St. Ives: CQC; 2021 [cited 2021 July]. Available from: https://nhssurveys.org/surveys/.
Kristensen SR, McDonald R, Sutton M. Should pay-for-performance schemes be locally designed? Evidence from the commissioning for quality and innovation (CQUIN) framework. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013;18:38–49.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bureau for Health Information. BHI patient surveys Sydney: BHI; 2021 [updated 23 February 2021; cited 2021 September]. Available from: https://www.bhi.nsw.gov.au/nsw_patient_survey_program.
Jones CH, Woods J, Brusco NK, Sullivan N, Morris ME. Implementation of the Australian hospital patient experience question set (AHPEQS): a consumer-driven patient survey. Aust Health Rev. 2021;45(5):562–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Delnoij DMJ, Rademakers JJ, Groenewegen PP. The Dutch consumer quality index: an example of stakeholder involvement in indicator development. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10(1):88.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program Baltimore, MD: CMS.gov; 2021 [updated 18 February 2021; cited 2021 July]. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/HospitalQualityInits/Hospital-Value-Based-Purchasing-.
Roland M. Linking physicians' pay to the quality of care--a major experiment in the United kingdom. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(14):1448–54.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Feng Y, Kristensen SR, Lorgelly P, Meacock R, Sanchez MR, Siciliani L, et al. Pay for performance for specialised care in England: strengths and weaknesses. Health Policy. 2019;123(11):1036–41.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bureau for Health Information. Measurement matters: development of patient experience key performance indicators for local health districts in NSW. Sydney (NSW): BHI; 2018.
Google Scholar
Bull C. Patient satisfaction and patient experience are not interchangeable concepts. Int J Qual Health Care. 2021;33(1):mzab023.
Ahmed F, Burt J, Roland M. Measuring patient experience: concepts and methods. Patient. 2014;7(3):235–41.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Williams B, Coyle J, Healy D. The meaning of patient satisfaction: an explanation of high reported levels. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47(9):1351–9.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Male L, Noble A, Atkinson J, Marson T. Measuring patient experience: a systematic review to evaluate psychometric properties of patient reported experience measures (PREMs) for emergency care service provision. Int J Qual Health Care. 2017;29(3):314–26.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Cornelis C, den Hartog SJ, Bastemeijer CM, Roozenbeek B, Nederkoorn PJ, Van den Berg-Vos RM. Patient-reported experience measures in stroke care: a systematic review. Stroke. 2021;52(7):2432–5.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Beattie M, Murphy DJ, Atherton I, Lauder W. Instruments to measure patient experience of healthcare quality in hospitals: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2015;4:97.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
DeVellis RF. Reliability. In: Bickman L, Rog DJ, editors. Scale development: theory and applications. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2017.
Google Scholar
Koller I, Levenson MR, Gluck J. What do you think you are measuring? A mixed-methods procedure for assessing the content validity of test items and theory-based scaling. Front Psychol. 2017;8(126):1–20.
Google Scholar
Terwee CB, Prinsen CAC, Chiarotto A, de Vet HCW, Bouter LM, Alonso J, et al. COSMIN methodology for assessing the content validity of PROMs. Amsterdam: Department of epidemiology and biostatistics, VU University Medical Center; 2018.
Google Scholar
Tsang S, Royse CF, Terkawi AS. Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017;11(Suppl 1):S80–S9.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Murphy M, Hollinghurst S, Salisbury C. Agreeing the content of a patient-reported outcome measure for primary care: a Delphi consensus study. Health Expect. 2017;20(2):335–48.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
van Rijssen LB, Gerritsen A, Henselmans I, Sprangers MA, Jacobs M, Bassi C, et al. Core set of patient-reported outcomes in pancreatic cancer (COPRAC): An international Delphi study among patients and health care providers. Ann Surg. 2019;270(1):158–64.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32(4):1008–15.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
McKenna HP. The Delphi technique: a worthwhile research approach for nursing? J Adv Nurs. 1994;19(6):1221–5.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, Melgar-Quinonez HR, Young SL. Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Front Public Health. 2018;6:149.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Bull C, Latimer S, Crilly J, Gillespie BM. A systematic mixed studies review of patient experiences in the ED. Emerg Med J. 2021;38:643–9.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Johnson JM, Bristow DN, Schneider KC. Did you not understand the question of not? An investigation of negatively worded questions in survey research. J Appl Bus Res. 2004;20(1):75–86.
Google Scholar
DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2017.
Google Scholar
Richardson G, Smith D. The readability of Australia’s goods and services tax legislation: an empirical investigation. Fed Law Rev. 2002;30(3):321–49.
Google Scholar
Australian Government. Style manual: literacy and access Canberra: commonwealth of Australia; 2021 [updated 15 April 2021; cited 2021 August]. Available from: https://www.stylemanual.gov.au/user-needs/understanding-needs/literacy-and-access.
Google Scholar
Polit DF, Beek CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(4):459–67.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489–97.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Sonis JD, Aaronson EL, Lee RY, Philpotts LL, White BA. Emergency department patient experience: a systematic review of the literature. J Patient Exp. 2018;5(2):101–6.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Holden D, Smart D. Adding value to the patient experience in emergency medicine: what features of the emergency department visit are most important to patients? Emerg Med. 1999;11(1):3–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Vaillancourt S, Seaton MB, Schull MJ, Cheng AHY, Beaton DE, Laupacis A, et al. Patients' perspectives on outcomes of care after discharge from the emergency department: a qualitative study. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;70(5):648–58 e2.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gordon J, Sheppard LA, Anaf S. The patient experience in the emergency department: a systematic synthesis of qualitative research. Int Emerg Nurs. 2010;18(2):80–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Chinkhata M, Langley G, Nyika A. Validation of a career guidance brochure for student nurses using the nominal group technique. Ann Glob Health. 2018;84(1):77–82.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Jones J, Hunter D. Qualitative research: consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ. 1995;311(7001):376.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Potter M, Gordon S, Hamer P. The nominal group technique: a useful consensus methodology in physiotherapy research. NZ J Physiother. 2004;32(2):70–5.
Google Scholar
Watts S, Stenner P. Introducing Q methodology: The inverted factor technique. In: Doing Q methodology research: Theory, method and interpretation [Internet]. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2012.
Google Scholar
Churruca K, Ludlow K, Wu W, Gibbons K, Nguyen HM, Ellis LA, et al. A scoping review of Q-methodology in healthcare research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021;21(1):125.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Nyumba TO, Wilson K, Derrick CJ, Mukherjee N. The use of focus group discussion methodology: insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods Ecol Evol. 2018;9(1):20–32.
Article
Google Scholar
DeVellis RF. Validity. Scale development: theory and applications. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SGAE Publications, Inc.; 2017.
Google Scholar
Rolstad S, Adler J, Ryden A. Response burden and questionnaire length: is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis. Value Health. 2011;14(8):1101–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bureau for Health Information. Emergency Department Patient Survey Sydney (NSW): BHI; 2021 [updated 12 August 2021; cited 2021 September]. Available from: https://www.bhi.nsw.gov.au/nsw_patient_survey_program/emergency_department_patient_survey.
Weinick RM, Becker K, Parast L, Stucky BD, Elliott MN, Mathews M, et al. Emergency dpeartment patient experience of care survey: development and feild test. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation; 2014.
Book
Google Scholar
Lavrakas PJ. Respondent Fatigue. In: Encyclopedia of survey research methods [internet]. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2008. Available from: https://methods.sagepub.com/reference/encyclopedia-of-survey-research-methods/n480.xml.
Chapter
Google Scholar
DeVellis RF. Factor analysis. In: Bickman L, Rog DJ, editors. Scale development: theory and applications. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2017.
Google Scholar
Australian Institute of Heakth and Welfare. Emergency department care 2017-18. Canberra: AIHW; 2019. [updated 1 March 2019; cited 2021 September]. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/hospitals/emergency-dept-care-2017-18/contents/use-of-services/variation-by-age-and-sex
Google Scholar