Skip to main content
Download PDF

Effect of the COVID-19 outbreak on emergency transport of children by an emergency medical service system: a population-based, ORION registry study

BMC Emergency Medicine volume 22, Article number: 206 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2, has spread rapidly around the world.

Objective

To assess the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the emergency medical service (EMS) and hospital admission course for children transported by ambulance.

Methods

This study was a retrospective, descriptive study with a study period from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2020 using the Osaka Emergency Information Research Intelligent Operation Network (ORION) system. All children who were transported by ambulance in Osaka Prefecture were included. The main outcome of this study was the rate of difficult-to-transfer cases, which was calculated by univariate and multivariate Poisson regression analyses.

Results

Over the 3 years between January 1, 2018 and December 31 2020, 1,436,212 patients were transported to hospitals by ambulances in Osaka Prefecture, with children accounting for 102,473 (37,064, 39,590, and 25,819, in 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively). Poisson regression analysis showed that children were negatively associated with difficult-to-transfer cases (risk ratio (RR) 0.35, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.37). With reference to 2018, 2020 was not significantly associated with difficult-to-transfer cases in children (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.32, P = 0.075), but was significantly related (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.27, P < 0.001) to difficult-to-transfer cases in the general population.

Conclusion

Children were consistently associated with a reduced RR for difficult-to-transfer cases, even in the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), causedby Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was identified in China in December 2019, and the COVID-19 outbreak spread rapidly around the world [1]. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 a pandemic.

Children with COVID-19 tend to have a milder clinical course than adults, and the clinical manifestations in children are heterogeneous, with a wide spectrum of clinical features [2,3,4,5]. The WHO recommends testing all suspected cases, but children with COVID-19 may not meet all the criteria of the suspected case definition. [6, 7]

A previous study in Osaka city showed a similar proportion of children transported by the emergency medical service (EMS) system to that seen in other countries, about 4% to 13% [8,9,10]. Our previous study showed about a 10% reduction in EMS service use in the overall population, including elderly patients, in 2020, possibly due to the COVID-19 pandemic [11]. However, EMS service studies related to the COVID-19 pandemic and children have been scarce.

Presently, to the best of our knowledge, no clinical studies of the effect of the COVID-19 outbreak and transport of children by the EMS system have been published.

This study aimed to assess the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the transport by ambulance of children by the EMS system in Osaka Prefecture.

Methods

The emergency medical service (EMS) system in Japan

When emergency patients call for EMS at the scene, on-scene EMS personnel assess the patient’s condition and then transport the patient to a hospital that can accept and treat the patient [12]. Only after obtaining permission from the selected hospital via a phone call, ambulances can transport the patient to the hospital [12]. All expenses are covered by local governments, and there is no charge to the patient for care and transportation. Recently, especially COVID-19 pandemic started, the number of cases of emergency patients’ transportation to a hospital by EMS has been increasing and exceeding the hospital capacity. Therefore, it has been increasing cases of refusal to provide emergency transportation.

Study design and setting

This was a retrospective, descriptive study with a study period from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2020 using the Osaka Emergency Information Research Intelligent Operation Network (ORION) system [13]. Osaka Prefecture is the largest metropolitan community in western Japan, with a population of about 8.8 million and a total area of 1905 km [2]. The Osaka Prefecture Government has developed and introduced an information system for emergency patients (the ORION system) that uses a smartphone application for hospital selection by on-scene emergency medical service personnel and has been collecting all ambulance records. Medical institutions have obtained information on the diagnoses and outcomes of patients transported to medical institutions, and the ORION system has merged these data with ambulance records, including smartphone application data, since January 2015. To assess the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the EMS system, this study focused on children transported by ambulance in Osaka Prefecture (Fig. 1). The children were divided into four age groups: infant (0 years); toddler (1–4 years); childhood (5–9 years); and adolescent (10–14 years). The presumptive diagnosis and the final diagnosis if the patients were admitted, with the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10), were used [14]. Data were collected using ICD-10 codes: Infectious and parasitic diseases, A00 to B99; Neoplasms, C00 to D48; Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases, E00 to E90; Mental and behavioral disorders, F00 to F99; Diseases of the nervous system, G00 to G99; Diseases of the eye and the ear, H00 to H95; Diseases of the nervous system, I00 to I99; Diseases of the respiratory system, J00 to J99; Diseases of the digestive system, K00 to K93; Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, L00 to L99; Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue, M00 to M99; Diseases of the genitourinary system, N00 to N99; Congenital diseases, Q00 to Q99; Symptoms, signs and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings, R00 to R99; Injury and poisoning, S00 to T98. ICD-10 codes O00 to O99 and P00 to P96 were excluded because these codes were defined as pregnancy-related cases (pregnant patients). Data for ‘COVID-19’ were collected using ICD-10 code U07.1, and data for ‘COVID-19 suspected’ (if the virus was not identified) were collected using ICD-10 code U07.2.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Patient flow in this study. All pediatric patients aged less than 15 years were included and then divided into four groups by age

Full size image

This study excluded patients who were not transported to a hospital. The ambulance records in Osaka Prefecture are considered administrative records, and the need to obtain informed consent from the participants was waived because the data were anonymous. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University (Takatsuki City, Japan) (reference number 2021–006). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines were used to design and report the results of this study [15].

Data collection and quality control

The ORION system uses a smartphone app for hospital selection by on‐scene EMS personnel and it has been accumulating all ambulance records. Data were uniformly collected using specific data collection forms and included the reason for the ambulance call, location of the accident, the time of day and the day of the week, and tools used, in addition to age, sex, and ICD-10 code. The detailed situation and patient information were recorded in text form. These data were completed by EMS personnel and then transferred to the information center in the Osaka Municipal Fire Department (OMFD). Medical institutions have registered information on the diagnosis and outcome of emergency patients transported to medical institutions, and the ORION system has merged these data with the respective ambulance records and smartphone app data. To assure the quality of the data, if the data were incomplete, the data sheet was supposed to be returned to the relevant EMS personnel to correct it.

Outcomes

The primary outcome of this study was the rate of difficulty obtaining hospital acceptance for transfer of a patient (difficult-to-transfer cases). According to the guidelines of the Fire and Disaster Management Agency of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, “difficult-to-transfer cases” were defined as those in which the time interval from arrival at the scene to departure from the scene was longer than 30 min, and those in which ambulance crews needed to make four or more phone calls to hospitals before obtaining hospital acceptance. In addition, disposition at the emergency department (ED), such as emergency admission, discharged to home, transfer to other hospital, and death at the ED, was also collected.

Data analysis

The number of patients transported by ambulance due to any cause except interhospital transport was calculated for the year from January 1 to December 31, 2020. Patient demographics were compared among the three years using the χ2 test for categorical variables and the Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables. For comparison purposes, the numbers of patients transported by ambulance for the same reasons per year from January 1 to December 31, 2018 and January 1 to December 31, 2019 were also collected. In addition, Poisson regression analysis with a robust standard error estimator was used to calculate the rate of difficulty of hospital acceptance of patients, and then the risk ratio (RR) for difficult-to-transfer cases and the 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated with 2018 as the reference. Then, the adjusted RR and 95% CI of difficult-to-transfer cases by month, time of transportation, day of week, COVID-19 suspected during transportation, and children were estimated using multivariate analyses.

All data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) or STATA (version 16.1; Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA). All tests were two-tailed, and p-values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics

For 3 years between January 1, 2018 and December31, 2020, 1,436,212 patients were transported to hospitals by ambulances in Osaka Prefecture. Of them, 1,346,457 were enrolled in this study. Excluded were 89,755 patients who were transferred to a different hospital. By year, 462,773 patients in 2018, 468,697 patients in 2019, and 414,987 patients in 2020 were transported to hospitals by ambulances (Table 1), with the total number of children (0–14 years old) being 97,558 (35,314, 37,547, and 24,697, in 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively, P < 0.001). In addition, the total number of infants was 9,090 (3,290, 3,375, and 2,425, in 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively). Table 1 shows other baseline characteristics of the pediatric patients transported to hospitals by ambulances in Osaka Prefecture. Figure 1 displays the flow diagram of this study.

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of transported patients
Full size table

It was difficult to obtain hospital acceptance for transfer of a total of 1,147 pediatric patients (397, 433, and 317, in 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively, P = 0.179) (Table 2).

Table 2 Difficult-to-transfer cases for children and hospital course
Full size table

Table 2 also shows the disposition at the ED.

The number of children who were suspected to have COVID-19 during transportation was 43 (4 infants, 20 toddlers, 8 childhoods, and 11 adolescents). Of these 43, only one adolescent was a difficult-to-transfer case.

Outcomes and adjusted analyses

The RR of difficult-to-transfer cases for pediatric patients in 2020 was not significant with reference to 2018 (1.16, 95%CI 0.74 to 1.82) (Table 3). Table 5 shows the same analysis as Table 4 for children only, and there was no significant association with difficult-to-transfer cases in 2020 (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.32, P = 0.081). Different from the general population, children were more accepted by hospitals in January and December than in June. With reference to 9 to 10 am, 3 pm to 2 am was significantly associated with difficult-to-transfer cases for children (Table 5). Similar to the general population, with reference to Friday, Saturday and Sunday had significantly higher RRs for difficult-to-transfer cases (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.70 and RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.70, respectively). There was no significant association between pediatric patients suspected to have COVID-19 and difficult-to-transfer cases (RR 1.72, 95% CI 0.25 to 12.08, P = 0.584).

Table 3 Univariate Poisson regression analysis for difficult-to-transfer cases and disposition at the emergency department
Full size table
Table 4 Multivariate Poisson regression analysis of difficult-to-transfer cases in all patients
Full size table
Table 5 Multivariate Poisson regression analysis of difficult-to-transfer cases in children
Full size table

In children, female sex was associated with difficult-to-transfer cases (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.35, P = 0.002) (Table 6). With reference to injury, poisoning and certain other consequences of external causes, diseases of the genitourinary system and diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue were positively associated with difficult-to-transfer cases (RR 1.66, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.75, P = 0.047 and RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.08, P = 0.006, respectively). Other diseases were inversely or not significantly associated with difficult-to-transfer cases (Table 6).

Table 6 Multivariate Poisson regression analysis of difficult-to-transfer cases in children
Full size table

Comparison of children vs. adults

The RR of difficult-to-transfer cases for adult patients older than or equal to 15 years in 2020 was significant with reference to 2018 (1.25, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.28) (Table 3). With reference to 2018, 2020 was significant for difficult-to-transfer cases for all patients (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.27) in Multivariate Poisson regression analysis (Table 4). In Table 4, with reference to Friday, all day, Saturday, and Sunday especially had significantly higher RRs for difficult-to-transfer cases (RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.30 and RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.43, respectively). In Table 4, with reference to 9 to 10 am, other times of day were significantly associated with difficult-to-transfer cases. With reference to June, other months were also significantly associated with difficult-to-transfer cases. There was a significant association of patients suspected to have COVID-19 with difficult-to-transfer cases (RR 2.50, 95% CI 2.27 to 2.75).

The severity of illness was shown in Supplemental Table 5 and Table 6. In Supplemental Table 5, the proportion of difficult-to-transfer cases of children in severe and moderate patients was comparable between pre-pandemic years and 2020. In Supplemental Table 6, the proportion of difficult-to-transfer cases of all patients in serious, severe, and moderate patients was higher in 2020 than pre-pandemic years.

Discussion

Children were associated with a reduced RR for difficulty in obtaining hospital acceptance for transfer of a patient (difficult-to-transfer cases) (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.37, P < 0.001) (Table 4). In contrast, adult patients had a greater RR for difficult-to-transfer cases than the other population (RR 2.87, 95% CI 2.71 to 3.04) (Supplemental Table 1).

During the 3-year study period, 1,147 children were difficult-to-transfer cases (397, 433, and 317 in 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively). However, it is important to reduce difficult-to-transfer cases, with or without the COVID-19 pandemic. There was a strong association of difficult-to-transfer cases with patients suspected to have COVID-19 in all age patients, but, interestingly, it was not applicable in children (Table 5). As a previous study showed, hospitals were most likely to accept patients of all ages in the morning (9 am to 10 am), on Fridays, and in the month of June, but this was not applicable to children (Table 5) [11]. In children, the year 2020 was not significantly associated with difficult-to-transfer cases, but the year was significantly associated with hospital admission at the ED (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.18, P < 0.001), even though children had a reduced RR for hospital admission from the ED (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.51, P < 0.001) (Supplemental Table 2 and Supplemental Table 4). The exact reason why children had a greater RR of admission in 2020 than the other two years is unclear. One of the reasons for this finding might be due to withholding the medically unnecessary EMS transports during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, as shown in Table 3 and Supplemental Table 2. In fact, COVID-19 was significantly associated with hospital admission from the ED (RR 5.27, 95% CI 4.06 to 6.85, P < 0.001). Table 6 shows an all-children analysis to investigate which diseases contributed to difficult-to-transfer cases. Injury and poisoning, genitourinary diseases and musculoskeletal diseases were associated with difficult-to-transfer cases for three years, and injury and poisoning were strongly associated with difficult-to-transfer cases in 2020, which was not thought to be related to COVID-19 (Table 6 and Supplemental Table 3). However, diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue was inversely　associated with hospital admission from the ED (Supplemental Table 2).

Neoplasms, diseases of the circulatory system, diseases of the nervous system, and congenital diseases had higher RRs of hospital admission than other diseases (Supplemental Table 2). This result was similar to other studies [16,17,18].

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is characterized by COVID-19-associated Kawasaki disease-like symptoms together with cardiac inflammation and toxic shock syndrome [19]. Kawasaki disease data were collected as ICD-10 code with M303, and 43 patients (19 in 2018, 15 in 2019, and 9 in 2020) were found. In addition, only 7 children had confirmed COVID-19 with admission, and all of them were discharged within 21 days. Thus, diseases of the circulatory system appeared to be different from MIS-C, and MIS-C was not a problem in Osaka Prefecture in 2020. The risk of MIS-C was lower for Omicron variants, compared to Alpha variants and Delta variants in Norway [20]. The proportion of MIS-C cases with severe organ system involvement decreased during widespread Delta and early Omicron circulation compared with before Delta circulation in the US [21]. Duration of hospitalization was shorter and the proportion of pediatric patients who received ICU-level care was significantly lower during widespread Delta and early Omicron circulation [21]. These differences in severity were due to variations in the host immune response, earlier clinical diagnosis, and treatment of MIS-C [21]. There was also a potentially altered clinical phenotype associated with some degree of preexisting immunity conferred by COVID-19 vaccination [21].

Neoplasms, congenital malformations, deformations, and chromosomal abnormalities also contributed to hospital admission from the ED. The caregivers of these patients might delay seeking medical services due to fear of COVID-19 exposure, which resulted in a hospital stay for treatment because most of these patients were immunocompromised [22, 23].

The present results suggest that injury and poisoning were the most common reasons for EMS calls in children and resulted in difficult-to-transfer cases, especially in 2020, but they did contribute to hospital admission from the ED. Pediatric trauma patients may require intensive assessment and care from a multidisciplinary approach [24]. In addition, children often cannot appropriately express their symptoms and signs to parents or EMS personnel, which might be one of the factors associated with the difficulty in hospital acceptance [24]. It is noteworthy that pediatric acute care centers have not been adequately established in Japan compared with other developed countries.

Female sex was associated with difficult-to-transfer cases, however we could not know exact reason why female sex was significantly associated with difficult-to-transfer cases. Girls are more prone to developing urinary tract infection in all age group except first year of life [25]. Connective tissue disorders are also more common in female [26]. Both diseases of the genitourinary system and diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue were associated with difficult-to-transfer cases more than injury and poisoning. Therefore, we postulate that these diseases might be associated with difficult-to-transfer cases.

There are several limitations in this study. First, COVID-19 is a new disease identified in 2020 in Japan, and acute upper respiratory tract infection or gastroenteritis as ICD-10 code U07.2 in which COVID-19 was suspected was included. Second, one hundred twenty-four patients were left without transportation. ORION system should have recorded the reason why they were not transported, but we could not find the reason. Some of them might be infected with COVID-19, however there were only 2 pediatric patients who were left without transportation. Third, this was a retrospective, observational study, and there might be some unknown confounding factors due to this study type. Fourth, this study uniformly defined the difficult-to-transfer cases regardless of the patient’s condition to assess differences by demographic factors or reasons for ambulance calls. Finally, adjustment for various factors such as medical history, medications, and health status could not be performed in the Poisson regression analysis, because this information was not available.

Conclusion

The present study found that children had a reduced RR for difficult-to-transfer cases, even in 2020 with the COVID-19 outbreak. Children also had a reduced RR for hospital admission from the ED, but it increased in 2020. Injury and poisoning were the most common reasons for EMS calls and difficult-to-transfer cases.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Wiersinga WJ, Rhodes A, Cheng AC, Peacock SJ, Prescott HC. Pathophysiology, transmission, diagnosis, and treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): a review. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc. 2020;324(8):782–93. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.12839.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shekerdemian LS, Mahmood NR, Wolfe KK, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of children with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection admitted to US and Canadian pediatric intensive care units. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(9):868–73. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jurado Hernández JL, Álvarez Orozco IF. COVID-19 in children: respiratory involvement and some differences with the adults. Front Pediatr. 2021;9(March):1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.622240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. de Souza TH, Nadal JA, Nogueira RJN, Pereira RM, Brandão MB. Clinical manifestations of children with COVID-19: a systematic review. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020;55(8):1892–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.24885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Irfan O, Muttalib F, Tang K, Jiang L, Lassi ZS, Bhutta Z. Clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes of paediatric COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child. 2021;(January):440–448. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2020-321385

  6. World Health Organization 2020. Public Health Surveillance for COVID-19 Interim Guidance 16 December 2020. Vol 2019. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2020. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-2019-nCoV-surveillanceguidance-2020.8.

  7. Su L, Ma X, Yu H, et al. The different clinical characteristics of corona virus disease cases between children and their families in China–the character of children with COVID-19. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020;9(1):707–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1744483.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Katayama Y, Kitamura T, Kiyohara K, et al. Factors associated with the difficulty in hospital acceptance at the scene by emergency medical service personnel: a population-based study in Osaka City. Japan BMJ Open. 2016;6(10):3–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee SU, Suh D, Kim HB, et al. Epidemiology of prehospital emergency medical service use in Korean children. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2017;4(2):102–8. https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.14.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shah MN, Cushman JT, Davis CO, Bazarian JJ, Auinger P, Friedman B. The epidemiology of emergency medical services use by children: an analysis of the national hospital ambulatory medical care survey. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014;12(3):269–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10903120802100167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ota K, Nishioka D, Katayama Y, et al. Influence of the COVID-19 outbreak on transportation of pregnant women in an emergency medical service system: Population-based, ORION registry. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;(February):1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14128

  12. Katayama Y, Kitamura T, Kiyohara K, et al. Improvements in patient acceptance by hospitals following the introduction of a smartphone app for the emergency medical service system: a population-based before-and-after observational study in Osaka city. Japan JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2017;5(9):1–13. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Okamoto J, Katayama Y, Kitamura T, et al. Profile of the ORION (Osaka emergency information Research Intelligent Operation Network system) between 2015 and 2016 in Osaka, Japan: a population-based registry of emergency patients with both ambulance and in-hospital records. Acute Med Surg. 2019;6(1):12–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/ams2.371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. WHO. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision ICD-10 : Tabular List. World Heal Organ. 2016;1:332–345. http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/icdonlineversions/en/.

  15. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1495–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Graetz D, Agulnik A, Ranadive R, et al. Global effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on paediatric cancer care: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Child Adolesc Heal. 2021;5(5):332–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00031-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Saed Aldien A, Ganesan GS, Wahbeh F, et al. Systemic inflammation may induce cardiac injury in COVID-19 patients including children and adolescents without underlying cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2021;(January). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2021.04.007

  18. Malle L, Gao C, Hur C, et al. Individuals with down syndrome hospitalized with COVID-19 have more severe disease. Genet Med. 2021;23(3):576–80. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-020-01004-w.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Loke Y-H, Berul CI, Harahsheh AS. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children: is there a linkage to Kawasaki disease? Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2020;30(7):389–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2020.07.004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Whittaker R, Greve-Isdahl M, Bøås H, Suren P, Buanes EA, Veneti L. COVID-19 Hospitalization Among Children <18 Years by Variant Wave in Norway. Pediatrics. 2022;150(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2022-057564

  21. Miller AD, Yousaf AR, Bornstein E, et al. Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children During Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Delta and Omicron Variant Circulation-United States, July 2021-January 2022. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;75(2):S303–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ding YY, Ramakrishna S, Long AH, et al. Delayed cancer diagnoses and high mortality in children during the COVID-19 pandemic. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020;67(9):3–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.28427.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lazzerini M, Barbi E, Apicella A, Marchetti F, Cardinale F, Trobia G. Delayed access or provision of care in Italy resulting from fear of COVID-19. Lancet Child Adolesc Heal. 2020;4(5):e10–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30108-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sakaino T, Honma T, Tsuji S, Ishiguro A, Sakai H. Pediatric ambulance diversions in the Tokyo Rule: pediatric emergency system for trauma should be established. Nihon Kyukyu Igakukai Zasshi. 2013;24(5):241–6. https://doi.org/10.3893/jjaam.24.241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chang SL, Shortliffe LD. Pediatric urinary tract infections. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2006;53(3):379–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2006.02.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gaubitz M. Epidemiology of connective tissue disorders. Rheumatology. 2006;45(SUPPL. 3):3–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kel282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the EMS providers, nurses, emergency physicians and administrators for their cooperation in the ORION. We thank all the members of The Working Group to Analyze the Emergency Medical Care System in Osaka Prefecture for their kind support.

Code availability

All data were statistically analyzed using SPSS version 25.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) or STATA (version 16.1; StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).

The name of the Ethical committee

The Ethics Committee of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University (Takatsuki City, Japan) (reference number 2021-006)

Funding

No funding was received for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan

    Koshi Ota, Kanna Ota, Masahiko Nitta & Akira Takasu

  2. The Working Group to Analyze the Emergency Medical Care System in Osaka Prefecture, Osaka, Japan

    Koshi Ota, Yusuke Katayama, Tetsuhisa Kitamura, Masahiko Nitta & Tetsuya Matsuoka

  3. Research and Development Center, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan

    Daisuke Nishioka

  4. Osaka Prefectural Government, Osaka, Japan

    Jun Masui

Authors
  1. Koshi Ota
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daisuke Nishioka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yusuke Katayama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tetsuhisa Kitamura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jun Masui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kanna Ota
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Masahiko Nitta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Tetsuya Matsuoka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Akira Takasu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

K.O. designed the study and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. Ka.O., D.N., T.K., Y.K., M.N., T.M., and A.T. contributed to analysis and interpretation of the data and assisted in the preparation of the manuscript. All authors contributed to data collection and interpretation and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work, including ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koshi Ota.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University (Takatsuki City, Japan) (reference number 2021–006).

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines were used to design and report the results of this study.

All the steps/ methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent to participate: Informed consent from the participants was waived because the data were anonymous. Ethics Committee of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University (Takatsuki City, Japan) (reference number 2021–006).

Consent for publication

Informed consent from the participants was waived because the data were anonymous. Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplemental Table 1.

Multivariate Poissonregression analysis of difficult-to-transfer cases in all patients (adult). SupplementalTable 2. Sensitivity analysis, multivariate Poisson regression analysis of EDdisposition in children only. Supplemental Table 3. Sensitivity analysis,multivariate Poisson regression analysis of difficult-to-transfer cases inchildren only in 2020. Supplemental Table 4. Sensitivity analysis, multivariatePoisson regression analysis of ED disposition in all patients (children as avariable). Supplemental Table 5. Theseverity of illness in children only. Supplemental Table 6. The severity of illness inall patients

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ota, K., Nishioka, D., Katayama, Y. et al. Effect of the COVID-19 outbreak on emergency transport of children by an emergency medical service system: a population-based, ORION registry study. BMC Emerg Med 22, 206 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00765-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00765-8

Keywords

BMC Emergency Medicine

ISSN: 1471-227X

Contact us